用于厌氧菌培养的固体培养基的比较。
Comparison of solid media for cultivation of anaerobes.
作者信息
Heginbothom M, Fitzgerald T C, Wade W G
机构信息
Department of Medical Microbiology, Llandough Hospital, Cardiff.
出版信息
J Clin Pathol. 1990 Mar;43(3):253-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.3.253.
Two commercial agar media for the cultivation of anaerobes were compared with four other media for their ability to support the growth of a wide range of anaerobes from clinical specimens of subgingival plaque. Fastidious anaerobe agar (FAA, Lab M) and anaerobe agar (GAA, Gibco) allowed better growth of the pure cultures than the other media. FAA recovered the highest numbers of bacteria from subgingival plaque specimens which were composed predominantly of anaerobes. GAA performed poorly with these samples. It is concluded that FAA seemed to be superior to the other media tested for the cultivation and recovery of anaerobes.
将两种用于厌氧菌培养的商业琼脂培养基与其他四种培养基进行比较，以评估它们支持从龈下菌斑临床标本中分离出的多种厌氧菌生长的能力。苛求厌氧菌琼脂（FAA，Lab M公司）和厌氧菌琼脂（GAA，Gibco公司）比其他培养基更有利于纯培养物的生长。FAA从主要由厌氧菌组成的龈下菌斑标本中回收的细菌数量最多。GAA在这些样本上表现不佳。结论是，在厌氧菌的培养和回收方面，FAA似乎优于其他测试培养基。
Zotero 插件