Colombo J, McCollam K, Coldren J T, Mitchell D W, Rash S J
Department of Human Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Apr;49(2):173-88. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90054-c.
In five experiments, 10-month-olds were habituated to exemplars of a form category and tested for categorization in paired-comparison trials involving in-category versus out-of-category stimuli. Across these experiments, color was systematically manipulated during habituation and/or test trials. Infants categorized form when color was either held constant or varied during habituation, but failed to categorize form when exposed to color-constant stimuli during habituation and tested for categorization with novel-color form exemplars. Two subsequent experiments traced this failure to the narrow experience of exposure to color-constant exemplars during habituation. These results suggest that (a) infants' internal representation for a category will not include a stimulus dimension not varied in the exemplars from which the category was derived, but (b) if variation in that dimension is experienced, exemplars constructed of novel instances of that dimension will still be regarded as belonging to the category.
在五项实验中,10个月大的婴儿先对一个形状类别的示例形成习惯化,然后在涉及类别内与类别外刺激的配对比较试验中进行分类测试。在这些实验中,颜色在习惯化和/或测试试验期间被系统地操纵。当颜色在习惯化期间保持不变或变化时,婴儿能够对形状进行分类,但当在习惯化期间接触颜色恒定的刺激并使用新颜色的形状示例进行分类测试时,婴儿无法对形状进行分类。随后的两项实验将这种失败归因于在习惯化期间接触颜色恒定示例的狭窄体验。这些结果表明:(a)婴儿对一个类别的内部表征不会包括在该类别所源自的示例中未变化的刺激维度,但(b)如果该维度经历了变化,由该维度的新实例构成的示例仍将被视为属于该类别。