• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving protocols for protein mapping through proper comparison to crystallography data.通过与晶体学数据的恰当比较来改进蛋白质图谱绘制的方案。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Feb 25;53(2):391-402. doi: 10.1021/ci300430v. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
2
Moving Beyond Active-Site Detection: MixMD Applied to Allosteric Systems.超越活性位点检测:MixMD应用于变构系统
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Aug 25;120(33):8685-95. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03515. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
3
Identifying binding hot spots on protein surfaces by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics: HIV-1 protease as a test case.通过混合溶剂分子动力学识别蛋白质表面的结合热点:以HIV-1蛋白酶为例
Biopolymers. 2016 Jan;105(1):21-34. doi: 10.1002/bip.22742.
4
Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.使用 MixMD 结合标准和加速分子动力学识别隐结合位点。
J Chem Inf Model. 2021 Mar 22;61(3):1287-1299. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01002. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
MixMD Probeview: Robust Binding Site Prediction from Cosolvent Simulations.MixMD Probeview:从共溶剂模拟中进行稳健的结合位点预测。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Jul 23;58(7):1426-1433. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00265. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Free Energies and Entropies of Binding Sites Identified by MixMD Cosolvent Simulations.通过 MixMD 共溶剂模拟确定结合位点的自由能和熵。
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 May 28;59(5):2035-2045. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00925. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Cosolvent Simulations with Fragment-Bound Proteins Identify Hot Spots to Direct Lead Growth.片段结合蛋白的共溶剂模拟确定引导先导化合物生长的热点。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Jun 14;18(6):3829-3844. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01054. Epub 2022 May 9.
8
Predicting Displaceable Water Sites Using Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics.利用混合溶剂分子动力学预测可置换水的位置。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Feb 26;58(2):305-314. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00268. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.配体结合引起的诱导契合蛋白构象变化是否可预测?分子动力学研究。
J Comput Chem. 2017 Jun 5;38(15):1229-1237. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24714. Epub 2017 Apr 16.
10
Hot spot analysis for driving the development of hits into leads in fragment-based drug discovery.基于片段的药物发现中推动命中向先导发展的热点分析。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jan 23;52(1):199-209. doi: 10.1021/ci200468p. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting fragment binding modes using customized Lennard-Jones potentials in short molecular dynamics simulations.在短分子动力学模拟中使用定制的 Lennard-Jones 势预测片段结合模式。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Dec 23;27:102-116. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.12.017. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhancing SILCS-MC via GPU Acceleration and Ligand Conformational Optimization with Genetic and Parallel Tempering Algorithms.通过 GPU 加速和遗传并行温度算法对 SILCS-MC 进行配体构象优化。
J Phys Chem B. 2024 Aug 1;128(30):7362-7375. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c03045. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
FTMove: A Web Server for Detection and Analysis of Cryptic and Allosteric Binding Sites by Mapping Multiple Protein Structures.FTMove:通过映射多个蛋白质结构来检测和分析隐秘和变构结合位点的网络服务器。
J Mol Biol. 2022 Jun 15;434(11):167587. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167587. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Application of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation in Computer-Aided Drug Design.配体竞争饱和法在计算机辅助药物设计中的应用。
New J Chem. 2022 Jan 21;46(3):919-932. doi: 10.1039/d1nj04028f. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.使用 MixMD 结合标准和加速分子动力学识别隐结合位点。
J Chem Inf Model. 2021 Mar 22;61(3):1287-1299. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01002. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Benchmark Sets for Binding Hot Spot Identification in Fragment-Based Ligand Discovery.基于片段的配体发现中结合热点识别的基准集。
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Dec 28;60(12):6612-6623. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00877. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
7
Optimization and Evaluation of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) as a Tool for Target-Based Ligand Optimization.基于配体竞争饱和(SILCS)的靶点鉴定方法在基于靶点的配体优化中的优化与评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jun 24;59(6):3018-3035. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00210. Epub 2019 May 8.
8
Free Energies and Entropies of Binding Sites Identified by MixMD Cosolvent Simulations.通过 MixMD 共溶剂模拟确定结合位点的自由能和熵。
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 May 28;59(5):2035-2045. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00925. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Deriving Ligand Orientation in Weak Protein-Ligand Complexes by DEEP-STD NMR Spectroscopy in the Absence of Protein Chemical-Shift Assignment.通过无蛋白化学位移赋值的深 STD NMR 光谱法推断弱蛋白配体复合物中的配体取向。
Chembiochem. 2019 Feb 1;20(3):340-344. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201800568. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
Predicting Displaceable Water Sites Using Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics.利用混合溶剂分子动力学预测可置换水的位置。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Feb 26;58(2):305-314. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00268. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational analysis of protein hotspots.蛋白质热点的计算分析。
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2010 Mar 25;1(3):125-9. doi: 10.1021/ml100026a. eCollection 2010 Jun 10.
2
Druggability Assessment of Allosteric Proteins by Dynamics Simulations in the Presence of Probe Molecules.在存在探针分子的情况下通过动力学模拟对变构蛋白进行成药潜力评估
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Jul 10;8(7):2435-2447. doi: 10.1021/ct300117j. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
3
Balancing target flexibility and target denaturation in computational fragment-based inhibitor discovery.在基于片段的计算抑制剂发现中平衡靶标灵活性和靶标变性。
J Comput Chem. 2012 Sep 5;33(23):1880-91. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23026. Epub 2012 May 28.
4
Structural conservation of druggable hot spots in protein-protein interfaces.蛋白质-蛋白质界面中可成药热点的结构保守性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13528-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101835108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
5
Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments.CCP4软件包概述及当前进展
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011 Apr;67(Pt 4):235-42. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
6
Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations.利用配体竞争饱和的位点鉴定(SILCS)模拟重现配体官能团的晶体结合模式。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Apr 25;51(4):877-96. doi: 10.1021/ci100462t. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
7
The rise of fragment-based drug discovery.片段化合物药物发现的兴起。
Nat Chem. 2009 Jun;1(3):187-92. doi: 10.1038/nchem.217.
8
Full protein flexibility is essential for proper hot-spot mapping.充分考虑蛋白质的柔韧性对于正确进行热点映射至关重要。
J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jan 19;133(2):200-2. doi: 10.1021/ja1079332. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
9
Crystal structure of RNase A tandem enzymes and their interaction with the cytosolic ribonuclease inhibitor.RNase A 串联酶的晶体结构及其与胞质核糖核酸酶抑制剂的相互作用。
FEBS J. 2011 Jan;278(2):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07957.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
10
Fragment-based lead discovery: screening and optimizing fragments for thermolysin inhibition.基于片段的先导化合物发现:热稳定蛋白酶抑制的片段筛选和优化。
ChemMedChem. 2010 Jun 7;5(6):930-40. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201000084.

通过与晶体学数据的恰当比较来改进蛋白质图谱绘制的方案。

Improving protocols for protein mapping through proper comparison to crystallography data.

机构信息

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, 428 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1065, USA.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Feb 25;53(2):391-402. doi: 10.1021/ci300430v. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1021/ci300430v
PMID:23327200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3581705/
Abstract

Computational approaches to fragment-based drug design (FBDD) can complement experiments and facilitate the identification of potential hot spots along the protein surface. However, the evaluation of computational methods for mapping binding sites frequently focuses upon the ability to reproduce crystallographic coordinates to within a low RMSD threshold. This dependency on the deposited coordinate data overlooks the original electron density from the experiment, thus techniques may be developed based upon subjective-or even erroneous-atomic coordinates. This can become a significant drawback in applications to systems where the location of hot spots is unknown. On the basis of comparison to crystallographic density, we previously showed that mixed-solvent molecular dynamics (MixMD) accurately identifies the active site for HEWL, with acetonitrile as an organic solvent. Here, we concentrated on the influence of protic solvent on simulation and refined the optimal MixMD approach for extrapolation of the method to systems without established sites. Our results establish an accurate approach for comparing simulations to experiment. We have outlined the most efficient strategy for MixMD, based on simulation length and number of runs. The development outlined here makes MixMD a robust method which should prove useful across a broad range of target structures. Lastly, our results with MixMD match experimental data so well that consistency between simulations and density may be a useful way to aid the identification of probes vs waters during the refinement of future multiple solvent crystallographic structures.

摘要

基于片段的药物设计(FBDD)的计算方法可以补充实验,并有助于确定蛋白质表面的潜在热点。然而,评估用于映射结合位点的计算方法的频率集中在能够将晶体学坐标复制到低 RMSD 阈值内的能力上。这种对已存入坐标数据的依赖性忽略了实验中的原始电子密度,因此可能会基于主观甚至错误的原子坐标来开发技术。在应用于热点位置未知的系统时,这可能成为一个重大缺陷。基于与晶体学密度的比较,我们之前表明,混合溶剂分子动力学(MixMD)可以准确识别 HEWL 的活性位点,其中乙腈作为有机溶剂。在这里,我们集中研究质子溶剂对模拟的影响,并改进了最佳的 MixMD 方法,以便将该方法外推到没有确定位置的系统。我们的结果为比较模拟与实验建立了一种准确的方法。我们已经根据模拟长度和运行次数概述了 MixMD 的最有效策略。这里概述的发展使 MixMD 成为一种稳健的方法,应该对广泛的目标结构都有用。最后,我们使用 MixMD 的结果与实验数据非常吻合,因此模拟和密度之间的一致性可能是在未来的多溶剂晶体结构精修过程中辅助识别探针与水的一种有用方法。