Suppr超能文献

[玻璃离子水门汀用于乳牙窝沟封闭有无酸蚀处理的临床疗效]

[Clinical efficacy of the glass ionomer cement used as pit and fissure sealant with and without acid etching in primary teeth].

作者信息

Tang Yu-Xiang, Wu Jie, Xu Wan-Tian, Chen Yun, Yu Shu-Xiang

机构信息

Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.

Dept. of Stomatology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210004, China.

出版信息

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 1;36(6):646-649. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.06.012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to compare the effect of retention and preventive caries of the pit and fissure sealant on primary teeth by using glass ionomer cements (GIC) with or without acid etching technique.

METHODS

In this clinical trail, 100 children aged 3-4 years old with a split-mouth design were equally divided into two groups (the left second upper and lower mandibular primary molars were present in group A, and the right second upper and lower mandibular primary molars were present in group B; each group had 200 molars). All participants were placed in pit and fissure sealant with Ketac® Molar Easymix and seated with atraumatic restorative treatmen press-finger technique in the two groups. Group A was subjected to acid etching (40 s, 35% H₃PO₄), while group B were not subjected to acid etching. GIC preservation rate, caries rate, and decayed teeth (dt) index were observed after 12 months.

RESULTS

After a 12-month follow-up period, the completely lost, partially losing, and losing rates of GIC in 86 children (172 second primary molars) were 83.14%, 9.88%, 6.98% in group A and 62.79%, 20.35%, and 16.86% in group B, respectively. The differences between the two groups were insignificant (P<0.05). The caries rates of groups A and B were 8.14% and 16.86%, and their dt indices were 0.08±0.31 and 1.17±0.46, respectively, thereby indicating significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using acid etching technology, the retention rate of the pit and fissure sealant increased, while its losing rate decreased. The retention effect of the GIC was improved, and the dental caries prevention effect was enhanced. Sealant processing was a self-curing procedure that sets without the external energy. Hence, this procedure is suitable for the preventive caries of primary teeth in children.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用或不使用酸蚀技术的玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)对乳牙进行窝沟封闭时的保留效果及防龋效果。

方法

在本临床试验中,采用双盲设计,将100名3 - 4岁儿童平均分为两组(A组为左侧上颌第二乳磨牙和下颌第二乳磨牙,B组为右侧上颌第二乳磨牙和下颌第二乳磨牙;每组有200颗磨牙)。两组均使用Ketac® Molar Easymix进行窝沟封闭,并采用无创修复治疗按压手指技术就位。A组进行酸蚀(40秒,35% H₃PO₄),B组不进行酸蚀。12个月后观察GIC保存率、龋病发生率及患龋牙(dt)指数。

结果

经过12个月的随访期,86名儿童(172颗第二乳磨牙)中,A组GIC的完全脱落率、部分脱落率和脱落率分别为83.14%、9.88%、6.98%,B组分别为62.79%、20.35%和16.86%。两组之间差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组和B组的龋病发生率分别为8.14%和16.86%,其dt指数分别为0.08±0.31和1.17±0.46,两组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

使用酸蚀技术后,窝沟封闭剂的保留率提高,脱落率降低。GIC的保留效果得到改善,防龋效果增强。封闭剂处理是一种无需外部能量即可固化的自固化过程。因此,该方法适用于儿童乳牙的龋病预防。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验