IOBA - Eye Institute, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Feb 5;54(2):1054-60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11015.
To assess the repeatability, intersession and interobserver reproducibility, and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by scanning-slit topography (SST) and noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM) after advanced surface ablation (ASA).
To analyze repeatability, one examiner measured 63 post-myopic ASA eyes five times successively using both techniques randomly. To calculate interobserver reproducibility a second examiner obtained another CCT measurement in a random fashion. To study intersession reproducibility, the first operator obtained CCT measurements from another 24 eyes during two sessions 1 week apart.
With regard to intrasession repeatability, SST and NCSM within-subject standard deviation (S(w)) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were 7.35 and 3.81 μm, and 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. For interobserver reproducibility, SST measurement variability showed correlation with CCT magnitude (r(s) = -0.38; P = 0.002), whereas NCSM did not. NCSM S(w) and ICC were 3.83 μm and 0.99, respectively. For intersession reproducibility, no difference in CCT measurements was found for any technique; S(w) and ICC estimates for SST and NCSM were 12.2 and 8.37 μm, and 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. We found a tendency for the difference (mean SST-NCSM = 13.39 μm) to increase in thicker corneas (r(s) = 0.45, P = 0.001).
Both noncontact pachymetry techniques provided highly repeatable and quite reproducible CCT measurements in post-ASA patients having no clinically significant corneal haze, except for SST interobserver reproducibility, which decreased in thinner corneas. However, the techniques were not interchangeable. The estimates provided should help clinicians differentiate real CCT change from noncontact pachymetry measurement variability after ASA.
评估先进表面消融(ASA)后,使用扫描裂隙地形图(SST)和非接触共焦显微镜(NCSM)测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)的重复性、内-间和观察者间重现性及一致性。
为了分析重复性,一位检查者使用两种技术随机连续五次测量 63 只近视 ASA 眼。为了计算观察者间重现性,第二位检查者以随机方式获得另一次 CCT 测量值。为了研究内-间重现性,第一位操作者在相隔 1 周的两次就诊期间对另外 24 只眼进行了 CCT 测量。
就日内重复性而言,SST 和 NCSM 内-间标准差(S(w))和组内相关系数(ICC)分别为 7.35μm 和 0.97,3.81μm 和 0.99。对于观察者间重现性,SST 测量的变异性与 CCT 幅度相关(r(s)=-0.38;P=0.002),而 NCSM 则没有。NCSM 的 S(w)和 ICC 分别为 3.83μm 和 0.99。对于内-间重现性,两种技术的 CCT 测量值均无差异;SST 和 NCSM 的 S(w)和 ICC 估计值分别为 12.2μm 和 0.837、10.2μm 和 0.95。我们发现,差异(平均 SST-NCSM=13.39μm)在较厚的角膜中呈增加趋势(r(s)=0.45,P=0.001)。
两种非接触式测厚技术均能在无临床显著角膜混浊的 ASA 后患者中提供高度可重复性和相当可重现性的 CCT 测量值,除了 SST 的观察者间重现性,在较薄的角膜中降低。然而,这两种技术不能互换。提供的估计值应有助于临床医生区分 ASA 后真实 CCT 变化与非接触式测厚测量值的变异性。