Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Institute of Biomedicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Int J Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;133(5):1033-41. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28038. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
There are growing data and a continuing controversy over the effect of folic acid supplementation on cancer risk. We conducted a meta-analysis based on up-to-date published relevant randomized trials to further examine this issue. Relative risk (RR) was used to measure the effect of folic acid supplementation on risk of cancer using a random-effects model. Overall, folic acid supplementation had no significant effect on total cancer incidence (13 trials, n = 49,406, RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.99-1.11, p = 0.13), colorectal cancer (seven trials, n = 33,824, 1.01; 0.82-1.23, p = 0.95), other gastrointestinal cancer (two trials, n = 20,228, 1.00; 0.75-1.33, p = 0.99), prostate cancer (five trials, n = 27,065, 1.17; 0.84-1.62, p = 0.35), other genitourinary cancer (two trials, n = 20,228, 0.97; 0.75-1.27, p = 0.84), lung cancer (five trials, n = 31,864, 1.00; 0.84-1.21, p = 0.97), breast cancer (four trials, n = 19,800, 0.82; 0.63-1.07, p = 0.15), hematological malignancy (three trials, n = 25,670, 0.87; 0.64-1.17, p = 0.35) and total cancer mortality (six trials, n = 31,930, 1.02; 0.90-1.15, p = 0.81). However, a significantly reduced risk was observed for melanoma (three trials, n = 19,128, 0.47; 0.23-0.94, p = 0.03). Furthermore, higher total cancer incidence risk was observed among those trials with a higher percent use of lipid-lowering drugs (>60%, 1.10; 1.00-1.20, p = 0.04), or with lower percent baseline hypertension (≤70%, 1.08; 1.00-1.16, p = 0.057).Consistently, meta-regression analyses suggested that the similar trend between percent use of lipid-lowering drugs (p = 0.084) or percent baseline hypertension (p = 0.056) and log-RR for total cancer incidence associated with folic acid supplementation. Our findings indicate that folic acid supplementation has no significant effect on total cancer incidence, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer or hematological malignancy, but reduces the risk of melanoma.
叶酸补充剂对癌症风险的影响的数据不断增加,且存在争议。我们基于最新发表的相关随机试验进行了荟萃分析,以进一步研究这个问题。使用随机效应模型,相对风险(RR)用于衡量叶酸补充剂对癌症风险的影响。总体而言,叶酸补充剂对总癌症发病率(13 项试验,n=49406,RR=1.05;95%CI:0.99-1.11,p=0.13)、结直肠癌(7 项试验,n=33824,1.01;0.82-1.23,p=0.95)、其他胃肠道癌(2 项试验,n=20228,1.00;0.75-1.33,p=0.99)、前列腺癌(5 项试验,n=27065,1.17;0.84-1.62,p=0.35)、其他泌尿生殖系统癌(2 项试验,n=20228,0.97;0.75-1.27,p=0.84)、肺癌(5 项试验,n=31864,1.00;0.84-1.21,p=0.97)、乳腺癌(4 项试验,n=19800,0.82;0.63-1.07,p=0.15)、血液恶性肿瘤(3 项试验,n=25670,0.87;0.64-1.17,p=0.35)和总癌症死亡率(6 项试验,n=31930,1.02;0.90-1.15,p=0.81)没有显著影响。然而,黑色素瘤(3 项试验,n=19128,0.47;0.23-0.94,p=0.03)的风险显著降低。此外,在那些使用降脂药物比例较高(>60%,1.10;1.00-1.20,p=0.04)或基线高血压比例较低(≤70%,1.08;1.00-1.16,p=0.057)的试验中,总癌症发病率的风险更高。荟萃回归分析表明,使用降脂药物的比例(p=0.084)或基线高血压的比例(p=0.056)与叶酸补充剂相关的总癌症发病率的对数 RR 之间存在相似的趋势。我们的研究结果表明,叶酸补充剂对总癌症发病率、结直肠癌、前列腺癌、肺癌、乳腺癌或血液恶性肿瘤没有显著影响,但降低了黑色素瘤的风险。