Unexpected predictor-outcome associations in clinical prediction research: causes and solutions.
作者信息
Schuit Ewoud, Groenwold Rolf H H, Harrell Frank E, de Kort Wim L A M, Kwee Anneke, Mol Ben Willem J, Riley Richard D, Moons Karel G M
机构信息
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2013 Jul 9;185(10):E499-505. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120812. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Unexpected predictor-outcome associations in clinical prediction research: causes and solutions.临床预测研究中意外的预测因素-结果关联：原因与解决方法
CMAJ. 2013 Jul 9;185(10):E499-505. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120812. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
2
Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes.预后研究策略（PROGRESS）1：研究临床结局的框架。
BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5595.
3
Emphasizing methods in outcomes research.强调结果研究中的方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):137-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.960831.
4
Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: stratified medicine research.预后研究策略（PROGRESS）4：分层医学研究。
BMJ. 2013 Feb 5;346:e5793. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5793.
5
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架：对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
6
Do We Need to Develop Critical Outcome Sets?我们是否需要制定关键结局集？
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jun 21;39(7):813-814. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz117.
7
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research.预后研究策略（PROGRESS）2：预后因素研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
Opportunities and limitations of general practice databases in pain research.全科医疗数据库在疼痛研究中的机遇与局限
Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):469-470. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 May 15.
9
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.预后研究策略（PROGRESS）3：预后模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
10
The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health.CROWN倡议：期刊编辑邀请研究人员制定女性健康的核心成果。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):487-488. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000396.
引用本文的文献
1
Association between bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity and its risk factors and long-term outcomes in three definitions: a historical cohort study.支气管肺发育不良严重程度与其危险因素及三种定义下长期结局的关联：一项历史性队列研究
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Dec 20;110(1):51-56. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-326931.
2
Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review.机器学习在预测康复治疗后中风患者结局中的应用：系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0287308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287308. eCollection 2023.
3
External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population.在德国人群中对六种用于预测慢性肾脏病的临床模型进行外部验证。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Aug 1;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02899-0.
4
Fear of movement and emotional distress as prognostic factors for disability in patients with shoulder pain: a prospective cohort study.运动恐惧和情绪困扰作为肩部疼痛患者残疾的预后因素：一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 26;23(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05139-6.
5
Performance of binary prediction models in high-correlation low-dimensional settings: a comparison of methods.二元预测模型在高相关性低维环境中的性能：方法比较
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Jan 11;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41512-021-00115-5.
6
Development and validation of a risk prediction model of preterm birth for women with preterm labour symptoms (the QUIDS study): A prospective cohort study and individual participant data meta-analysis.早产症状女性早产风险预测模型的开发与验证（QUIDS研究）：一项前瞻性队列研究和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 6;18(7):e1003686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003686. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Retrospective study on the possible existence of a treatment paradox in sepsis scores in the emergency department.回顾性研究在急诊科脓毒症评分中可能存在的治疗悖论。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 11;11(3):e046518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046518.
8
Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Accounting for Future Initiation of Statin Treatment.考虑未来开始使用他汀类药物治疗的情况下预测心血管疾病风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;190(10):2000-2014. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab031.
9
Invited Commentary: Treatment Drop-in-Making the Case for Causal Prediction.特邀评论：治疗脱落——为因果预测辩护。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;190(10):2015-2018. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab030.
10
Association between Computed Tomographic Biomarkers of Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases and Long-Term Outcome after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑小血管病 CT 标志物与自发性脑出血后长期预后的关系。
Ann Neurol. 2021 Feb;89(2):266-279. doi: 10.1002/ana.25949. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Development and validation of a prediction model for low hemoglobin deferral in a large cohort of whole blood donors.开发并验证了一个用于预测大量全血献血者低血红蛋白不合格的预测模型。
Transfusion. 2012 Dec;52(12):2559-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03655.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
2
Prediction of neonatal metabolic acidosis in women with a singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation.预测头位足月单胎妊娠孕妇的新生儿代谢性酸中毒。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Mar;29(3):167-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1284226. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
3
Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.多变量荟萃分析：潜力与前景。
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 10;30(20):2481-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.4172. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.调整诊断准确性研究中的差异验证偏倚：一种贝叶斯方法。
Epidemiology. 2011 Mar;22(2):234-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318207fc5c.
5
Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore.医学研究中缺失的协变量数据：填补优于忽略。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
6
A systematic review of p53 as a prognostic factor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the four main anatomical subsites of the head and neck.一项关于 p53 作为头颈部四个主要解剖部位鳞状细胞癌生存预后因素的系统评价。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Feb;19(2):574-87. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0981.
7
Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice.预后与预后研究：预后模型在临床实践中的应用与影响
BMJ. 2009 Jun 4;338:b606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b606.
8
Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.心血管风险新标志物评估标准：美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2009 May 5;119(17):2408-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
9
A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances.一种将临床预测模型调整至适用于当地情况的简单方法。
Can J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;56(3):194-201. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9041-x. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
10
General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.用于初级保健的一般心血管风险概况：弗雷明汉心脏研究
Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
Zotero 插件