Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jan 24;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-15.
There is little information regarding lay-people's representations of influenza and influenza-like illness in their day-to-day lives. An insight into these views may aid our understanding of community attitudes regarding official recommendations for its prevention.
This was a qualitative research. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 40 French participants from the community, and from five different locations. Questions elicited the participants' representations of onset of flu and influenza-like illness, as well as their views on what can/should be done to deal with symptoms and their personal experience with flu and flu-like symptoms.
Thematic content analyses allowed us to identify five main themes: the presence of a clear continuum between influenza-like illness and flu; a description of flu as a very contagious disease; flu as being benign, except in "frail people", which the respondents never considered themselves to be; interruption of daily activities, which could be considered pathognomonic for influenza for most subjects; self-medication as the main current practice, and requests for healthcare mainly to confirm an auto-diagnosis.
There was a large homogeneity in the representation of flu. There was also a gap between people's representations (i.e., a continuum from having a "cold" to having "influenza") and scientific knowledge (i.e., a distinction between "true" influenza and influenza-like illnesses based on the existence of a confirmatory virological diagnosis). This gap raises issues for current campaigns for flu prevention, as these may not be congruent with the representation of flu being responsible for interrupting daily activities while also being seen as a non-severe disease, as well as the perception that flu is only a risk to "frail people" though no participants considered themselves to be "frail".
关于普通民众在日常生活中对流感和类流感的认知,相关信息较少。了解这些观点可能有助于我们理解社区对流感预防的官方建议的态度。
这是一项定性研究。我们对来自社区的 40 名法国参与者以及来自五个不同地点的参与者进行了半结构化的面对面访谈。问题引出了参与者对流感和类流感发作的认知,以及他们对可以/应该采取哪些措施来应对症状以及个人对流感和类流感症状的看法。
主题内容分析使我们能够确定五个主要主题:流感样疾病和流感之间存在明显的连续体;流感被描述为一种传染性很强的疾病;流感是良性的,除了“脆弱人群”,受访者从不认为自己是“脆弱人群”;日常活动的中断,这在大多数人看来是流感的特征;自我药疗是目前的主要做法,寻求医疗保健主要是为了确认自我诊断。
流感的表现存在很大的同质性。人们的认知(即从“感冒”到“流感”的连续体)与科学知识(即基于确认性病毒学诊断来区分“真正的”流感和类流感疾病)之间也存在差距。这种差距给当前的流感预防运动带来了问题,因为这些运动可能与流感负责中断日常活动的认知不符,而流感也被视为一种非严重疾病,以及人们认为流感只对“脆弱人群”有风险的看法,尽管没有参与者认为自己是“脆弱人群”。