• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用带有证言的健康信息来激发结肠癌筛查:与感知认同和生动性的关联。

Using a health message with a testimonial to motivate colon cancer screening: associations with perceived identification and vividness.

机构信息

1Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2013 Dec;40(6):673-82. doi: 10.1177/1090198112473111. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1177/1090198112473111
PMID:23355445
Abstract

Research suggests that testimonials, or first-person narratives, influence health behavior and health-related decision making, but few studies have examined conceptual factors that may be responsible for these effects. In the current study, older adults who were due for colorectal cancer screening read a message about screening that included a testimonial from a similar other who had previously made the screening decision. We assessed participants' identification with the testimonial character and the degree to which they found the message to be vivid. We explored associations between these factors and participants' knowledge following the message, mood, certainty about screening, and their behavioral intentions to look for more information about screening and to have a test in the next year. In bivariate analyses, identification and vividness were both significantly, positively associated with knowledge and behavioral intentions to have screening in the next year. However, multivariate analyses revealed that only vividness remained significantly associated with knowledge and intentions to be screened.

摘要

研究表明,推荐(证言,或第一人称叙述)会影响健康行为和与健康相关的决策,但很少有研究探讨可能导致这些影响的概念因素。在当前的研究中,即将进行结直肠癌筛查的老年人阅读了一条关于筛查的信息,其中包括一位之前做出过筛查决定的相似他人的证言。我们评估了参与者对证言人物的认同程度,以及他们对信息的生动程度的看法。我们探讨了这些因素与参与者在收到信息后的知识、情绪、对筛查的确定性以及他们寻找更多关于筛查信息并在明年进行检查的行为意向之间的关联。在单变量分析中,认同度和生动度都与知识和明年进行筛查的行为意向呈显著正相关。然而,多变量分析显示,只有生动度与知识和接受筛查的意向仍然显著相关。

相似文献

1
Using a health message with a testimonial to motivate colon cancer screening: associations with perceived identification and vividness.使用带有证言的健康信息来激发结肠癌筛查:与感知认同和生动性的关联。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Dec;40(6):673-82. doi: 10.1177/1090198112473111. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
2
How many "Get Screened" messages does it take? Evidence from colorectal cancer screening promotion in the United States, 2012.需要多少条“接受筛查”信息?来自美国 2012 年结直肠癌筛查推广的证据。
Prev Med. 2014 Mar;60:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
3
Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.医生对结直肠癌筛查的咨询:对患者态度、信念和行为的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):673-81. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110001.
4
Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌风险增加的汽车行业员工中与感知风险相关的因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Jan;10(1):35-43.
5
Investigating Hispanic/Latino perceptions about colorectal cancer screening: a community-based approach to effective message design.调查西班牙裔/拉丁裔对结直肠癌筛查的看法:一种基于社区的有效信息设计方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 22.
6
Knowledge and beliefs of Jordanians toward colorectal cancer screening.约旦人对结直肠癌筛查的知识和信念。
Cancer Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):141-8. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181b823f3.
7
Testing different formats for communicating colorectal cancer risk.测试传达结直肠癌风险的不同形式。
J Health Commun. 1999 Oct-Dec;4(4):311-24. doi: 10.1080/108107399126841.
8
Ease of imagination, message framing, and physical activity messages.易于想象、信息框架和体育活动信息。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):197-211. doi: 10.1348/135910709X447811. Epub 2009 May 29.
9
How to enhance physician and public acceptance and utilisation of colon cancer screening recommendations.如何提高医生和公众对结肠癌筛查建议的接受度和利用率。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):509-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.002.
10
Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening in rural southern Taiwan.影响台湾南部农村地区大肠癌筛检的因素。
Cancer Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;36(4):284-91. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318263f46a.

引用本文的文献

1
Scope, Findability, and Quality of Information About Music-Based Interventions in Oncology: Quantitative Content Analysis of Public-Facing Websites at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers.肿瘤学中音乐干预信息的范围、可发现性和质量:国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心面向公众的网站的定量内容分析。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Nov 22;10:e53440. doi: 10.2196/53440.
2
Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: Do testimonials by experts work?鼓励环保行为:专家证言有效吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291612. eCollection 2023.
3
Videos using different message strategies to promote the interruption of sedentary behavior in university students during online lectures - A pilot study.
使用不同信息策略的视频来促进大学生在网络课程中打断久坐行为 - 一项试点研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;11:1108154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1108154. eCollection 2023.
4
Knowledge matters and empowers: HPV vaccine advocacy among HPV-related cancer survivors.知识就是力量:HPV 相关癌症幸存者的 HPV 疫苗倡导。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2407-2413. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05035-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Promoting cardiovascular health and wellness among African-Americans: Community participatory approach to design an innovative mobile-health intervention.促进非裔美国人的心血管健康与健康:设计创新型移动健康干预措施的社区参与式方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0218724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218724. eCollection 2019.
6
How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.叙事如何影响结直肠癌筛查决策和参与:一个现实主义综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):327-337. doi: 10.1111/hex.12892. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
"Hey, that could be me": The role of similarity in narrative persuasion.“嘿,那可能是我”:相似性在叙事说服中的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 18;14(4):e0215359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215359. eCollection 2019.
8
Improving Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Intervention to Compare Screener vs. Survivor Narratives.提高结直肠癌筛查依从性:一项比较筛查者与幸存者叙述的随机干预研究。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(2):141-155. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1587109. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
9
Assessing emotions conveyed and elicited by patient narratives and their impact on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A psychophysiological investigation.评估患者叙述所传达和引发的情绪及其对参与结直肠癌筛查意愿的影响:一项心理生理学研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199882. eCollection 2018.
10
Designing a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a community-based narrative intervention for improving colorectal cancer screening for African Americans.设计一项随机对照试验,以评估一种基于社区的叙事干预措施对改善非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;65:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Dec 1.