Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 25;3(1):e001847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001847.
To assess whether residential proximity to industrial incinerators in England is associated with increased risk of cancer incidence and mortality.
Retrospective study using matched case-control areas.
Five circular regions of radius 10 km near industrial incinerators in England (case regions) and five matched control regions, 1998-2008.
All cases of diseases of interest within the circular areas.
Counts of childhood cancer incidence (<15 years); childhood leukaemia incidence (<15 years); leukaemia incidence; liver cancer incidence; lung cancer incidence; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence; all-cause mortality; infant mortality (<1 year) and liver cancer mortality.
The estimated relative risks for case circles versus control circles for the nine outcomes considered range from 0.94 to 1.14, and show neither elevated risk in case circles compared to control areas nor elevated risk with proximity to incinerators within case circles.
This study applies statistical methods for analysing spatially referenced health outcome data in regions with a hypothesised exposure relative to matched regions with no such exposure. There is no evidence of elevated risk of cancer incidence or mortality in the vicinity of large industrial incinerators in England.
评估英格兰住宅与工业焚化炉之间的邻近程度是否与癌症发病率和死亡率的增加有关。
使用匹配病例对照区域的回顾性研究。
英格兰五个工业焚化炉附近半径为 10 公里的圆形区域(病例区域)和五个匹配的对照区域,1998-2008 年。
圆形区域内所有相关疾病的病例。
儿童癌症发病率(<15 岁);儿童白血病发病率(<15 岁);白血病发病率;肝癌发病率;肺癌发病率;非霍奇金淋巴瘤发病率;全因死亡率;婴儿死亡率(<1 岁)和肝癌死亡率。
考虑到九个结果,病例圈与对照圈的估计相对风险从 0.94 到 1.14 不等,病例圈与对照区相比,既没有显示出风险升高,也没有显示出与病例圈内焚化炉的接近程度有关的风险升高。
本研究应用了分析具有假设暴露的区域与没有这种暴露的匹配区域的空间参考健康结果数据的统计方法。在英格兰,大型工业焚化炉附近没有癌症发病率或死亡率升高的证据。