Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy.
Environ Health. 2009 Dec 23;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-60.
Management of solid waste (mainly landfills and incineration) releases a number of toxic substances, most in small quantities and at extremely low levels. Because of the wide range of pollutants, the different pathways of exposure, long-term low-level exposure, and the potential for synergism among the pollutants, concerns remain about potential health effects but there are many uncertainties involved in the assessment. Our aim was to systematically review the available epidemiological literature on the health effects in the vicinity of landfills and incinerators and among workers at waste processing plants to derive usable excess risk estimates for health impact assessment.
We examined the published, peer-reviewed literature addressing health effects of waste management between 1983 and 2008. For each paper, we examined the study design and assessed potential biases in the effect estimates. We evaluated the overall evidence and graded the associated uncertainties.
In most cases the overall evidence was inadequate to establish a relationship between a specific waste process and health effects; the evidence from occupational studies was not sufficient to make an overall assessment. For community studies, at least for some processes, there was limited evidence of a causal relationship and a few studies were selected for a quantitative evaluation. In particular, for populations living within two kilometres of landfills there was limited evidence of congenital anomalies and low birth weight with excess risk of 2 percent and 6 percent, respectively. The excess risk tended to be higher when sites dealing with toxic wastes were considered. For populations living within three kilometres of old incinerators, there was limited evidence of an increased risk of cancer, with an estimated excess risk of 3.5 percent. The confidence in the evaluation and in the estimated excess risk tended to be higher for specific cancer forms such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma than for other cancers.
The studies we have reviewed suffer from many limitations due to poor exposure assessment, ecological level of analysis, and lack of information on relevant confounders. With a moderate level confidence, however, we have derived some effect estimates that could be used for health impact assessment of old landfill and incineration plants. The uncertainties surrounding these numbers should be considered carefully when health effects are estimated. It is clear that future research into the health risks of waste management needs to overcome current limitations.
固体废物(主要是垃圾填埋场和焚烧厂)的管理会释放出许多有毒物质,大多数物质的含量都很小,处于极低的水平。由于污染物种类繁多,暴露途径不同,长期处于低水平暴露,以及污染物之间可能存在协同作用,人们仍然对潜在的健康影响表示担忧,但在评估中存在许多不确定性。我们的目的是系统地回顾现有的关于垃圾填埋场和焚烧厂附近以及废物处理厂工人健康影响的流行病学文献,以得出可用于健康影响评估的可用超额风险估计。
我们查阅了 1983 年至 2008 年间发表的、同行评审的有关废物管理健康影响的文献。对于每一篇论文,我们都检查了研究设计,并评估了效应估计值中的潜在偏差。我们评估了整体证据,并对相关不确定性进行了分级。
在大多数情况下,总体证据不足以确定特定废物处理过程与健康影响之间的关系;职业研究的证据不足以进行全面评估。对于社区研究,至少对于某些过程,有一些因果关系的有限证据,并且选择了一些研究进行定量评估。特别是,对于居住在距离垃圾填埋场两公里范围内的人群,出生缺陷和低体重的超额风险分别为 2%和 6%,证据有限。当考虑处理有毒废物的地点时,超额风险往往更高。对于居住在距离旧焚烧厂三公里范围内的人群,癌症风险增加的证据有限,估计超额风险为 3.5%。对评估和估计超额风险的置信度往往更高,对于非霍奇金淋巴瘤和软组织肉瘤等特定癌症形式,而不是其他癌症。
我们回顾的研究由于暴露评估、分析的生态水平以及缺乏相关混杂因素的信息,存在许多局限性。然而,我们有一定程度的信心,得出了一些可用于旧垃圾填埋场和焚烧厂健康影响评估的效应估计值。在估计健康影响时,应仔细考虑这些数字周围的不确定性。显然,未来废物管理健康风险的研究需要克服当前的局限性。