Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Resuscitation Science, USA.
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):910-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are lifesaving, but little is known about where they are located or how to find them. We sought to locate AEDs in high employment areas of Philadelphia and characterize the process of door-to-door surveying to identify these devices.
Block groups representing approximately the top 3rd of total primary jobs in Philadelphia were identified using the US Census Local Employment Dynamics database. All buildings within these block groups were surveyed during regular working hours over six weeks during July-August 2011. Buildings were characterized as publically accessible or inaccessible. For accessible buildings, address, location type, and AED presence were collected. Total devices, location description and prior use were gathered in locations with AEDs. Process information (total people contacted, survey duration) was collected for all buildings.
Of 1420 buildings in 17 block groups, 949 (67%) were accessible, but most 834 (88%) did not have an AED. 283 AEDs were reported in 115 buildings (12%). 81 (29%) were validated through visualization and 68 (24%) through photo because employees often refused access. In buildings with AEDs, several employees (median 2; range 1-8) were contacted to ascertain information, which required several minutes (mean 4; range 1-55).
Door-to-door surveying is a feasible, but time-consuming method for identifying AEDs in high employment areas. Few buildings reported having AEDs and few permitted visualization, which raises concerns about AED access. To improve cardiac arrest outcomes, efforts are needed to improve the availability of AEDs, awareness of their location and access to them.
自动体外除颤器(AED)可拯救生命,但人们对其位置或如何找到它们知之甚少。我们试图在费城高就业地区找到 AED,并描述挨家挨户调查以识别这些设备的过程。
使用美国人口普查局的本地就业动态数据库,确定代表费城总初级工作岗位前 1/3 的街区组。在 2011 年 7 月至 8 月的六周内,在正常工作时间内对这些街区组内的所有建筑物进行了调查。将建筑物描述为公众可进入或不可进入。对于可进入的建筑物,收集地址、位置类型和 AED 存在情况。在有 AED 的位置收集了总设备数量、位置描述和先前使用情况。为所有建筑物收集了过程信息(总联系人数、调查持续时间)。
在 17 个街区组的 1420 座建筑物中,有 949 座(67%)可进入,但大多数 834 座(88%)没有 AED。在 115 座建筑物(12%)中报告了 283 台 AED。通过可视化验证了 81 个(29%),通过照片验证了 68 个(24%),因为员工经常拒绝进入。在有 AED 的建筑物中,联系了几名员工(中位数 2;范围 1-8)以确定信息,这需要几分钟(平均 4;范围 1-55)。
挨家挨户调查是识别高就业地区 AED 的可行但耗时的方法。报告有 AED 的建筑物很少,很少允许可视化,这引起了对 AED 可及性的关注。为了改善心脏骤停的结果,需要努力提高 AED 的可用性、对其位置的认识以及获取它们的途径。