Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 5000 W National Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53295, USA.
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Mar 1;167(3):250-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.508.
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic headache treatment in children and adolescents. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials, and bibliography of retrieved articles through August 11, 2012. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials of headache treatment among children and adolescents (<18 years old). INTERVENTION Any placebo-controlled trial or comparisons between 2 or more active medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Number of headaches per month. RESULTS Among 21 included trials, there were 13 placebo-controlled and 10 active comparator trials (2 also included placebo). Twenty trials focused on episodic migraines and 1 on chronic daily headaches. Drugs more effective than placebo for episodic migraines (<15 headaches per month) included topiramate (difference in headaches per month, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.24) and trazodone (-0.60; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.11). Ineffective drugs included clonidine, flunarizine, pizotifen, propranolol, and valproate. A single trial of fluoxetine for chronic daily headaches found it ineffective. Patients given placebo experienced a significant (P = .03) decline in headaches, from 5.6 (95% CI, 4.52-6.77; Q = 8.14 [Cochran Q is a measure of the heterogeneity of the included studies]) to 2.9 headaches per month (95% CI, 1.66-4.08; Q = 4.72). Among the 10 active comparator trials, flunarizine was more effective than piracetam (difference in headaches per month, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.93 to -0.47) but no better than aspirin, dihydroergotamine, or propranolol. Propranolol was compared with valproate as well as behavioral treatment, and 2 studies compared different doses of topiramate; none of these trials showed significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Topiramate and trazodone have limited evidence supporting efficacy for episodic migraines. Placebo was effective in reducing headaches. Other commonly used drugs have no evidence supporting their use in children and adolescents. More research is needed.
评估预防性头痛治疗在儿童和青少年中的效果。
PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 临床试验数据库以及截至 2012 年 8 月 11 日检索文章的参考文献。
儿童和青少年(<18 岁)头痛治疗的随机试验。
任何安慰剂对照试验或 2 种以上活性药物之间的比较。
每月头痛次数。
在 21 项纳入的试验中,有 13 项为安慰剂对照试验,10 项为活性药物比较试验(其中 2 项也包括安慰剂)。20 项试验集中于发作性偏头痛,1 项集中于慢性每日头痛。对于发作性偏头痛(<15 次头痛/月),比安慰剂更有效的药物包括托吡酯(每月头痛次数差异,-0.71;95%置信区间,-1.19 至 -0.24)和曲唑酮(-0.60;95%置信区间,-1.09 至 -0.11)。无效药物包括可乐定、氟桂利嗪、哌唑嗪、普萘洛尔和丙戊酸。对于慢性每日头痛,一项氟西汀的单试验发现其无效。接受安慰剂的患者头痛明显(P=0.03)减少,从 5.6(95%置信区间,4.52-6.77;Q=8.14[Cochran Q 是衡量纳入研究异质性的指标])减少至每月 2.9 次头痛(95%置信区间,1.66-4.08;Q=4.72)。在 10 项活性药物比较试验中,氟桂利嗪比吡拉西坦更有效(每月头痛次数差异,-2.20;95%置信区间,-3.93 至 -0.47),但并不优于阿司匹林、二氢麦角胺或普萘洛尔。普萘洛尔与丙戊酸以及行为治疗进行了比较,有 2 项研究比较了不同剂量的托吡酯;这些试验均未显示出显著差异。
托吡酯和曲唑酮有有限的证据支持其用于发作性偏头痛的疗效。安慰剂在减少头痛方面有效。其他常用药物没有证据支持在儿童和青少年中使用。需要更多的研究。