• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同时间点过敏反应的发病率、病因及治疗的比较。

Comparison of the incidence, etiology, and management of anaphylaxis over time.

作者信息

Fuzak Julia K, Trainor Jennifer

机构信息

Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Feb;29(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828058cd.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828058cd
PMID:23364374
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Failure to promptly recognize and treat anaphylaxis can result in death. Understanding the incidence, etiology, and management is imperative. A previous pediatric study identified latex as the most common anaphylaxis allergen. We aim to describe the incidence, etiology, and management of anaphylaxis prelatex and postlatex-precaution implementation.

METHODS

Retrospective review of inpatient and emergency department (ED) records of pediatric anaphylaxis patients seen at 1 institution between 1986 and 1990 or 2002 and 2006 was performed. Patients with 2 systemic symptoms (gastrointestinal, respiratory, hypotension/syncope, oropharyngeal, altered mental status) or 1 systemic symptom plus 1 cutaneous symptom (urticaria, edema, or flushing) were included.

RESULTS

Fifty-three episodes were included from 1986 to 1990. A total of 117 episodes were included from 2002 to 2006. Approximately 80% of cases presented to the ED. From 1986 to 1990, we noted 30.5 cases per 100,000 ED visits versus 38 cases per 100,000 ED visits from 2002 to 2006. Food allergens were most common in both groups (43%). Latex accounted for only 1.9% of cases in 1986 to 1990 versus 1.7% postlatex precautions. Prehospital epinephrine use was poor. Patients in 2002 to 2006 were more likely to receive steroids, H2-blockers, epinephrine autoinjectors, and allergist referrals but less likely to receive epinephrine.

CONCLUSIONS

The etiology of pediatric anaphylaxis has not significantly changed over time but seems to differ across regions because latex was not a significant allergen at this institution in either period. The incidence of anaphylaxis has increased slightly. Anaphylaxis remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Improved education of patients/caregivers and health care providers is needed.

摘要

背景

未能及时识别和治疗过敏反应可能导致死亡。了解其发病率、病因及管理方法至关重要。此前一项儿科研究表明,乳胶是最常见的过敏反应过敏原。我们旨在描述在实施乳胶预防措施之前和之后过敏反应的发病率、病因及管理情况。

方法

对1986年至1990年或2002年至2006年期间在1家机构就诊的儿科过敏反应患者的住院和急诊科记录进行回顾性分析。纳入有2种全身症状(胃肠道、呼吸、低血压/晕厥、口咽、精神状态改变)或1种全身症状加1种皮肤症状(荨麻疹、水肿或潮红)的患者。

结果

1986年至1990年纳入53例病例。2002年至2006年共纳入117例病例。约80%的病例在急诊科就诊。1986年至1990年,每100,000次急诊科就诊中有30.5例病例,而2002年至2006年为每100,000次急诊科就诊中有38例病例。两组中食物过敏原最为常见(43%)。1986年至1990年乳胶仅占病例的1.9%,实施乳胶预防措施后为1.7%。院前使用肾上腺素的情况较差。2002年至2006年的患者更有可能接受类固醇、H2受体阻滞剂、肾上腺素自动注射器及过敏症专科医生转诊,但接受肾上腺素的可能性较小。

结论

儿科过敏反应的病因随时间推移未发生显著变化,但似乎因地区而异,因为在该机构两个时期乳胶都不是主要过敏原。过敏反应的发病率略有上升。过敏反应仍未得到充分诊断和治疗。需要加强对患者/护理人员及医疗保健提供者的教育。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the incidence, etiology, and management of anaphylaxis over time.不同时间点过敏反应的发病率、病因及治疗的比较。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Feb;29(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828058cd.
2
Anaphylaxis management in the pediatric emergency department: opportunities for improvement.儿科急诊科的过敏反应管理:改进的机会
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Feb;26(2):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce2e1c.
3
Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
Improving anaphylaxis management in a pediatric emergency department.改善儿科急诊的过敏反应管理。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Nov;22(7):708-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01181.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
5
Tick bite anaphylaxis: incidence and management in an Australian emergency department.蜱虫叮咬过敏反应:在澳大利亚急诊科的发生率和处理方法。
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Aug;25(4):297-301. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12093. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
6
Emergency department anaphylaxis: A review of 142 patients in a single year.急诊科过敏反应:一年中142例患者的回顾
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Nov;108(5):861-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.119028.
7
An analysis of anaphylaxis cases at a single pediatric emergency department during a 1-year period.对某儿科急诊部一年内发生的过敏反应病例进行分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Apr;118(4):461-464. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.02.002.
8
Acute allergic reactions in the emergency department: characteristics and management practices.急诊科的急性过敏反应:特征与管理实践
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(4):253-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000155.
9
Anaphylaxis in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Analysis of 133 Cases After an Allergy Workup.儿科急诊中的过敏反应:过敏检查后的 133 例分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1256-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.011. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
10
Anaphylaxis: underdiagnosed, underreported, and undertreated.过敏反应:诊断不足、报告不足、治疗不足。
Am J Med. 2014 Jan;127(1 Suppl):S1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Significant handling errors and education gaps regarding the use of the emergency kit among adult patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy.成年膜翅目毒液过敏患者在使用急救包方面存在重大操作失误和知识缺口。
Allergol Select. 2025 Jan 22;9:1-7. doi: 10.5414/ALX02476E. eCollection 2025.
2
Population-based incidence of all-cause anaphylaxis and its development over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于人群的全因过敏反应发病率及其随时间的变化:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Allergy. 2023 Dec 12;4:1249280. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1249280. eCollection 2023.
3
Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.
医疗保健专业人员对过敏反应的认知水平。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2022 Oct 27;12(4):e41. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
U.S. Population-Based background incidence rates of medical conditions for use in safety assessment of COVID-19 vaccines.美国基于人群的医疗条件基础发病率,用于评估 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性。
Vaccine. 2021 Jun 23;39(28):3666-3677. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 14.
5
Update on the usage and safety of epinephrine auto-injectors, 2017.2017年肾上腺素自动注射器使用情况与安全性最新进展
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017 Mar 21;9:9-18. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S121733. eCollection 2017.