Suppr超能文献

对某儿科急诊部一年内发生的过敏反应病例进行分析。

An analysis of anaphylaxis cases at a single pediatric emergency department during a 1-year period.

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Apr;118(4):461-464. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.02.002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Case series of anaphylaxis can vary regarding causes, treatments, and follow-up of patients. Unfortunately, case series that are specific to the pediatric population are few.

OBJECTIVE

To describe confirmed cases of pediatric anaphylaxis in patients presenting to a pediatric hospital emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We identified all ED visits with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 995.XX (allergic reactions) and 989.5 (sting or venom reaction) for 1 calendar year (January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014). Cases were reviewed by an allergist and an emergency medicine physician to identify true anaphylaxis cases using National Institute of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases criteria. Any questionable or debatable cases were evaluated and adjudicated by a second allergist.

RESULTS

We identified 927 unique ED visits. Of these visits, 40 were determined to definitively meet anaphylaxis criteria. Median age of the patients was 6.5 years. A total of 70% of patients were male, and 80% were African American. Causes included foods (65%), venom or insect sting (12.5%), and medications (5%), and 17.5% were idiopathic. All patients had multiorgan involvement, with 98% having skin involvement, 78% having lower respiratory tract symptoms, and 40% having gastrointestinal symptoms. There were no deaths. Only 33% of patients received epinephrine at some point in their care. Only 12 patients were referred to an allergist, and only 4 of these were actually seen by an allergist.

CONCLUSION

At our center, foods are the most common trigger for pediatric anaphylaxis. Patients continue to be undertreated, and referral to an allergist from the ED is rare.

摘要

背景

过敏反应的病例系列可能因病因、治疗方法和患者随访情况而异。遗憾的是,针对儿科人群的病例系列研究很少。

目的

描述在儿科医院急诊就诊的儿科过敏反应确诊病例。

方法

我们通过国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD-9)代码 995.XX(所有过敏反应)和 989.5(蜇伤或毒液反应),确定了 1 个日历年内(2014 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)所有急诊就诊。通过过敏症专家和急诊医师对病例进行回顾,使用国家卫生研究院/国家过敏和传染病研究所的标准来确定真正的过敏反应病例。任何可疑或有争议的病例均由第二位过敏症专家进行评估和裁决。

结果

我们共确定了 927 例独特的急诊就诊。在这些就诊中,有 40 例被确定为符合过敏反应标准的病例。患者的中位年龄为 6.5 岁。70%的患者为男性,80%为非裔美国人。病因包括食物(65%)、毒液或昆虫蜇伤(12.5%)和药物(5%),17.5%为特发性。所有患者均有多个器官受累,98%有皮肤受累,78%有下呼吸道症状,40%有胃肠道症状。无死亡病例。只有 33%的患者在治疗过程中的某个时间点接受了肾上腺素治疗。只有 12 例患者被转介至过敏症专家,其中仅有 4 例实际就诊。

结论

在我们中心,食物是引发儿科过敏反应最常见的原因。患者的治疗仍不足,且从急诊转至过敏症专家处的情况很少见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验