Suppr超能文献

家庭为基础的远程儿童姑息治疗:系统评价。

The case for home based telehealth in pediatric palliative care: a systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Online Health, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 1;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade technology has rapidly changed the ability to provide home telehealth services. At the same time, pediatric palliative care has developed as a small, but distinct speciality. Understanding the experiences of providing home telehealth services in pediatric palliative care is therefore important.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken to identify and critically appraise published work relevant to the area. Studies were identified by searching the electronic databases Medline, CINAHL and Google Scholar. The reference list of each paper was also inspected to identify any further studies.

RESULTS

There were 33 studies that met the inclusion criteria of which only six were pediatric focussed. Outcome measures included effects on quality of life and anxiety, substitution of home visits, economic factors, barriers, feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction and readiness for telehealth. While studies generally identified benefits of using home telehealth in palliative care, the utilisation of home telehealth programs was limited by numerous challenges.

CONCLUSION

Research in this area is challenging; ethical issues and logistical factors such as recruitment and attrition because of patient death make determining effectiveness of telehealth interventions difficult. Future research in home telehealth for the pediatric palliative care population should focus on the factors that influence acceptance of telehealth applications, including goals of care, access to alternative modes of care, perceived need for care, and comfort with using technology.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,技术的快速发展改变了提供家庭远程医疗服务的能力。与此同时,儿科姑息治疗已经发展成为一个小而独特的专业。因此,了解在儿科姑息治疗中提供家庭远程医疗服务的经验非常重要。

方法

进行了文献综述,以确定和批判性评估与该领域相关的已发表作品。通过搜索电子数据库 Medline、CINAHL 和 Google Scholar 来识别研究。还检查了每篇论文的参考文献列表,以确定任何其他研究。

结果

有 33 项符合纳入标准的研究,其中只有 6 项是儿科重点。结果衡量标准包括生活质量和焦虑的影响、家庭访问的替代、经济因素、障碍、可行性、可接受性、满意度和对远程医疗的准备情况。虽然这些研究通常都确定了在姑息治疗中使用家庭远程医疗的好处,但家庭远程医疗计划的使用受到许多挑战的限制。

结论

该领域的研究具有挑战性;由于患者死亡导致的伦理问题和后勤因素,如招募和流失,使得确定远程医疗干预的有效性变得困难。未来针对儿科姑息治疗人群的家庭远程医疗研究应侧重于影响远程医疗应用接受度的因素,包括护理目标、获得替代护理模式的机会、对护理的感知需求以及使用技术的舒适度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53d4/3584741/045c3f57740b/1472-684X-12-4-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验