• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结局指标在炎性风湿性疾病管理中的重要性。

The Importance of Outcome Measures in the Management of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.

作者信息

Molina Collada Juan, Trives Laura, Castrejón Isabel

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Open Access Rheumatol. 2021 Jul 12;13:191-200. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S276980. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S276980
PMID:34285602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8285275/
Abstract

Rheumatic inflammatory diseases include a diverse and heterogeneous group of multifaceted disorders in which clinical history and physical examination are essential to make treatment choices and for optimizing outcomes. Composite outcome measures have become very relevant in rheumatology to evaluate disease activity as they capture the most important dimensions of the disease into one single measure. Most outcome measures may include disease manifestations, laboratory data, physician examination as well as the patient perspective as different outcome dimensions of the disease into a simple index. These outcome measures have proved their utility for guiding treatment in treat-to- target strategies and personalized medicine, with remission being the ultimate goal. In this narrative review, we go over the most commonly used outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, including psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus to provide a practical summary for clinicians for everyday routine care.

摘要

风湿性炎症性疾病包括一组多样且异质性的多方面病症,其中临床病史和体格检查对于做出治疗选择和优化治疗结果至关重要。复合结局指标在风湿病学中对于评估疾病活动度变得非常重要,因为它们将疾病的最重要方面纳入单一指标。大多数结局指标可能包括疾病表现、实验室数据、医生检查以及患者对疾病不同结局维度的看法,将其整合为一个简单指数。这些结局指标已证明在指导达标治疗策略和个性化医疗中的效用,缓解是最终目标。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们回顾了类风湿关节炎、脊柱关节炎(包括银屑病关节炎)和系统性红斑狼疮中最常用的结局指标,为临床医生日常常规护理提供实用总结。

相似文献

1
The Importance of Outcome Measures in the Management of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.结局指标在炎性风湿性疾病管理中的重要性。
Open Access Rheumatol. 2021 Jul 12;13:191-200. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S276980. eCollection 2021.
2
Health outcomes of pediatric rheumatic diseases.儿科风湿性疾病的健康结果。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;28(2):331-50. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.04.001.
3
Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis/Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Consensus-Based Recommendations and Research Agenda for Use of Composite Measures and Treatment Targets in Psoriatic Arthritis.银屑病和银屑病关节炎研究与评估小组/风湿病学结局指标共识推荐意见及银屑病关节炎中使用复合指标和治疗目标的研究计划。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;70(3):345-355. doi: 10.1002/art.40391. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
4
Development of composite measures for psoriatic arthritis: a report from the GRAPPA 2010 annual meeting.关节炎性银屑病综合指标的制定:GRAPPA2010 年会报告。
J Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;39(2):398-403. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111233.
5
Complex measures and indices for clinical research compared with simple patient questionnaires to assess function, pain, and global estimates as rheumatology "vital signs" for usual clinical care.与简单的患者问卷相比,用于临床研究的复杂指标和指数可评估功能、疼痛和整体估计,作为风湿病“生命体征”用于常规临床护理。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;35(4):779-86, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.010.
6
Quantitative measurement of patient status in the regular care of patients with rheumatic diseases over 25 years as a continuous quality improvement activity, rather than traditional research.作为一项持续质量改进活动而非传统研究,对25年以上风湿性疾病患者常规护理中的患者状况进行定量测量。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):69-81.
7
Patient self-report RADAI (Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index) joint counts on an MDHAQ (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire) in usual care of consecutive patients with rheumatic diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis.患者在接受常规治疗的情况下,使用 MDHAQ(多维健康评估问卷)报告自身的 RADAI(类风湿关节炎疾病活动指数)关节计数,这些患者患有除类风湿关节炎以外的其他风湿性疾病。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Feb;65(2):288-93. doi: 10.1002/acr.21793.
8
Clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.类风湿关节炎和银屑病关节炎的临床缓解。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Sep-Oct;36(5):900-910. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Cardio-Rheumatology: Two Collaborating Disciplines to Deal with the Enhanced Cardiovascular Risk in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.心脏风湿病学:处理自身免疫性风湿病中增强心血管风险的两个协作学科。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(6):533-537. doi: 10.2174/1570161118666200721145718.
10
Reuma.pt contribution to the knowledge of immune-mediated systemic rheumatic diseases.Reuma.pt对免疫介导的系统性风湿性疾病知识的贡献。
Acta Reumatol Port. 2017 Jul-Sep;42(3):232-239.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus: an expert Delphi consensus to guide implementation in routine care.系统性红斑狼疮的患者报告结局指标:一项专家德尔菲共识,以指导在常规护理中的实施。
BMC Rheumatol. 2024 Jul 16;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00401-x.
2
Development of a novel clinimetric tool: PAtient Reported Disease Activity Index in Rheumatoid Arthritis (PARDAI-RA) by PANLAR, for the assessment of patients living with rheumatoid arthritis.新型临床计量工具的开发:PANLAR 制定的用于评估类风湿关节炎患者的患者报告疾病活动指数(PARDAI-RA)。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Apr;43(4):1277-1285. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06868-w. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Management of Specific Clinical Profiles in Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Expert's Document Based on a Systematic Literature Review and Extended Delphi Process.轴性脊柱关节炎特定临床特征的管理:基于系统文献综述和扩展德尔菲法的专家文件
Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Oct;10(5):1215-1240. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00575-9. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Measures of Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Disease Activity and Damage.成人系统性红斑狼疮的评估:疾病活动与损伤
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72 Suppl 10:27-46. doi: 10.1002/acr.24221.
2
Minimal Clinically Important Improvement of Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者报告结局测量 3 简化版日常评估的最小临床重要改善。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;46(1):27-30. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180153. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
3
Value of the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Tight-Control Clinical Trial and an Observational Cohort.患者指数数据 3 常规评估在银屑病关节炎患者中的价值:来自严格控制临床试验和观察性队列的结果。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Aug;70(8):1198-1205. doi: 10.1002/acr.23460. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update.EULAR 推荐的类风湿关节炎治疗策略:2016 年更新版
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Responsiveness of a simple RAPID-3-like index compared to disease-specific BASDAI and ASDAS indices in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.简单 RAPID-3 样指数与疾病特异性 BASDAI 和 ASDAS 指数在轴性脊柱关节炎患者中的反应性比较。
RMD Open. 2016 Jul 7;2(2):e000235. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000235. eCollection 2016.
6
Prediction of Remission in a French Early Arthritis Cohort by RAPID3 and other Core Data Set Measures, but Not by the Absence of Rheumatoid Factor, Anticitrullinated Protein Antibodies, or Radiographic Erosions.通过RAPID3和其他核心数据集指标预测法国早期关节炎队列中的病情缓解情况,而非通过类风湿因子、抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体或影像学侵蚀的缺失情况进行预测。
J Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;43(7):1285-91. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141586. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2015年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/acr.22783. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Treating to target in psoriatic arthritis.银屑病关节炎的达标治疗
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;27(2):107-10. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000140.
9
Disease activity measurements and monitoring in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.银屑病关节炎和中轴型脊柱关节炎的疾病活动度测量和监测。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Oct;28(5):711-28. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
10
The EULAR Outcome Measures Library: an evolutional database of validated patient-reported instruments.欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)疗效指标库:一个经过验证的患者报告工具的发展型数据库。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Feb;74(2):475-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206485. Epub 2014 Dec 1.