• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚保护区的森林砍伐在冲突后时期有所增加。

Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics. Universidad del Rosario, Kr 26 No 63B-48, 111221, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.

Ecología del Paisaje y Modelación de Ecosistemas-ECOLMOD, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Cra. 30 # 45-03, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61861-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-61861-y
PMID:32188909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7080754/
Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are a foundational and essential strategy for reducing biodiversity loss. However, many PAs around the world exist on paper only; thus, while logging and habitat conversion may be banned in these areas, illegal activities often continue to cause alarming habitat destruction. In such cases, the presence of armed conflict may ultimately prevent incursions to a greater extent than the absence of conflict. Although there are several reports of habitat destruction following cessation of conflict, there has never been a systematic and quantitative "before-and-after-conflict" analysis of a large sample of PAs and surrounding areas. Here we report the results of such a study in Colombia, using an open-access global forest change dataset. By analysing 39 PAs over three years before and after Colombia's peace agreement with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), we found a dramatic and highly significant increase in the deforestation rate for the majority of these areas and their buffer zones. We discuss the reasons behind such findings from the Colombian case, and debate some general conservation lessons applicable to other countries undergoing post-conflict transitions.

摘要

保护区(PAs)是减少生物多样性丧失的基础和必要策略。然而,世界上许多保护区仅停留在纸面上;因此,尽管这些地区可能禁止伐木和栖息地转换,但非法活动仍在继续,导致令人震惊的栖息地破坏。在这种情况下,武装冲突的存在可能最终会比没有冲突更能阻止入侵。尽管有几起因冲突停止而导致的栖息地破坏的报告,但从未对大量保护区及其周边地区进行过系统和定量的“冲突前-冲突后”分析。在这里,我们使用一个开放获取的全球森林变化数据集报告了哥伦比亚的此类研究结果。通过分析哥伦比亚与哥伦比亚革命武装力量(FARC)达成和平协议前三年和后三年的 39 个保护区,我们发现这些地区及其缓冲区的森林砍伐率大幅显著增加。我们从哥伦比亚案例中讨论了这些发现的原因,并就其他正在经历冲突后过渡的国家适用的一些一般性保护经验进行了辩论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/44dbb1c48d29/41598_2020_61861_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/e7b018b023eb/41598_2020_61861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/7ec041097900/41598_2020_61861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/633ecd5023db/41598_2020_61861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/44dbb1c48d29/41598_2020_61861_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/e7b018b023eb/41598_2020_61861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/7ec041097900/41598_2020_61861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/633ecd5023db/41598_2020_61861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7080754/44dbb1c48d29/41598_2020_61861_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods.哥伦比亚保护区的森林砍伐在冲突后时期有所增加。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61861-y.
2
EBP-Colombia and the bioeconomy: Genomics in the service of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development.EBP-Colombia 与生物经济:基因组学服务于生物多样性保护和可持续发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 25;119(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115641119.
3
Excess Child Mortality Associated With Colombia's Armed Conflict, 1998-2019.哥伦比亚武装冲突导致的儿童超额死亡,1998-2019 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248510. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8510.
4
Fires in protected areas reveal unforeseen costs of Colombian peace.保护区火灾揭示了哥伦比亚和平的意料之外代价。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan;3(1):20-23. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0727-8. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Representation of global and national conservation priorities by Colombia's Protected Area Network.哥伦比亚保护区网络对全球和国家保护重点的体现。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 12;5(10):e13210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013210.
6
Disarmament is the New War, Gold is the New Opium, and Ecohealth is the Historic Victim.裁军即新战争,黄金即新鸦片,而生态健康是历史受害者。
Environ Health Insights. 2019 Jul 15;13:1178630219862241. doi: 10.1177/1178630219862241. eCollection 2019.
7
Forests and drugs: coca-driven deforestation in tropical biodiversity hotspots.森林与毒品:古柯引发的热带生物多样性热点地区森林砍伐。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Feb 15;45(4):1219-27. doi: 10.1021/es102373d. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Isolation typology through accessibility measures considering rurality and armed conflict. A case study in Caldas, Colombia.通过考虑农村和武装冲突的可达性措施进行隔离类型学。哥伦比亚卡尔达斯的案例研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Oct;21(4):6128. doi: 10.22605/RRH6128. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
9
Tracking extinction risk trends and patterns in a mega-diverse country: A Red List Index for birds in Colombia.追踪一个生物多样性大国的灭绝风险趋势和模式:哥伦比亚鸟类红色名录指数。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0227381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227381. eCollection 2020.
10
Effectiveness of China's protected areas in reducing deforestation.中国保护区减少森林砍伐的成效。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(18):18651-18661. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05232-9. Epub 2019 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Peace in Colombia requires healing the scars of conflict on the mind and brain.哥伦比亚的和平需要治愈冲突在人们心灵和大脑上留下的创伤。
Nat Med. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03857-7.
2
Influence of landscape structure on carbon storage in agroforestry systems with cacao and silvopastoral systems in the Colombian Amazon.哥伦比亚亚马逊地区可可农林复合系统和农牧林系统中景观结构对碳储存的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0325477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325477. eCollection 2025.
3
Business-as-usual trends will largely miss 2030 global conservation targets.

本文引用的文献

1
FARC and the forest: Peace is destroying Colombia's jungle - and opening it to science.哥伦比亚革命武装力量与森林:和平正在摧毁哥伦比亚的丛林——并向科学敞开大门。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7709):169-170. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05397-2.
2
Sustainable Cattle Ranching in Practice: Moving from Theory to Planning in Colombia's Livestock Sector.实践中的可持续养牛业:哥伦比亚畜牧业从理论到规划的转变
Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):176-184. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0902-8. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
3
Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation.热带森林砍伐导致的全球生物多样性丧失。
照常行事的趋势将在很大程度上无法实现2030年的全球保护目标。
Ambio. 2025 Feb;54(2):212-224. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02085-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
4
From Stand to Forest: Woody Plant Recruitment in an Andean Restoration Project.从林中空地到森林:安第斯山脉恢复项目中的木本植物引种
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;13(17):2474. doi: 10.3390/plants13172474.
5
The web of conflict-related interactions in Colombia: exploring causal linkages between ecological and social variables by the qualitative loop analysis.哥伦比亚冲突相关互动网络:通过定性循环分析探索生态和社会变量之间的因果关系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Sep 9;379(1909):20230165. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0165. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Unlocking sustainable livestock production potential in the Colombian Amazon through paddock division and gender inclusivity.通过围场划分和性别包容释放哥伦比亚亚马逊地区可持续畜牧生产潜力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13644. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63697-2.
7
Systematic challenges and opportunities in insect monitoring: a Global South perspective.昆虫监测中的系统挑战与机遇:以全球南方为视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jun 24;379(1904):20230102. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0102. Epub 2024 May 6.
8
Underlying and proximate drivers of biodiversity changes in Mesoamerican biosphere reserves.中美洲生物圈保护区生物多样性变化的根本和近因驱动因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Feb 6;121(6):e2305944121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305944121. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
9
Leveraging limited data from wildlife monitoring in a conflict affected region in Venezuela.利用委内瑞拉受冲突影响地区有限的野生动物监测数据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):1673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52133-0.
10
Long-term relationships of beef and dairy cattle and greenhouse gas emissions: Application of co-integrated panel models for Latin America.肉牛和奶牛与温室气体排放的长期关系:协整面板模型在拉丁美洲的应用。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 9;10(1):e23364. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23364. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):5775-5777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706264114. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide.全球范围内,陆地保护区内的本地生物多样性高于保护区外。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 28;7:12306. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12306.
5
Coca cultivation and crop eradication in Colombia: The challenges of integrating rural reality into effective anti-drug policy.哥伦比亚的古柯种植与作物根除:将农村现实融入有效禁毒政策面临的挑战。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Jul;33:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human-modified tropical forest landscapes?人为干扰下的热带森林景观中生物同质化有多普遍?
Ecol Lett. 2015 Oct;18(10):1108-18. doi: 10.1111/ele.12494. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
Conservation. Drug policy as conservation policy: narco-deforestation.保护。作为保护政策的毒品政策:毒品导致的森林砍伐。
Science. 2014 Jan 31;343(6170):489-90. doi: 10.1126/science.1244082.
8
High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.高分辨率的 21 世纪全球森林覆盖变化地图集。
Science. 2013 Nov 15;342(6160):850-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693.
9
Landscape dynamics in northwestern Amazonia: an assessment of pastures, fire and illicit crops as drivers of tropical deforestation.西北亚马逊地区的景观动态:牧场、火灾和非法作物对热带森林砍伐的驱动因素评估。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054310. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas.避免热带森林保护区生物多样性崩溃。
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):290-4. doi: 10.1038/nature11318.