Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London, and Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):1094-103. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318275d032.
To assess short-term neuropsychological function and academic performance in school children following admission to intensive care and to explore the role of critical neurologic and systemic infection.
A prospective observational case-control study.
Two PICUs.
A consecutive sample of 88 children aged 5-16 years (median age=10.00, interquartile range=6.00-13.00) who were admitted to intensive care between 2007 and 2010 with meningoencephalitis, septic illness, or other critical illnesses. They were assessed 3 to 6 months following discharge, and their performance was compared with that of 100 healthy controls. Patients were without prior neurologic or neurodevelopmental disorder.
None.
Data encompassing demographic and critical illness details were obtained, and children were assessed using tests of intellectual function, memory, and attention. Questionnaires addressing academic performance were returned by teachers. After adjusting for covariates, the children admitted to PICUs significantly underperformed on neuropsychological measures in comparison to healthy controls (p<0.02). Teachers deemed more children admitted to PICUs than controls as performing educationally worse and having problems with school work (ps=0.001), as well as performing below average on aspects of executive function and attention (ps<0.04). Analysis of the effect of illness type on outcome revealed that aspects of neuropsychological function, such as memory function, and teacher-rated academic performance were most reduced in children with meningoencephalitis and septic illness. In the PICU group, multivariable linear regression revealed that worse performance on a composite score of neuropsychologic impairment was more prevalent when children were younger, from a lower social class, and had experienced seizures during their admission (ps<0.02).
Admission to intensive care is followed by deficits in neuropsychologic performance and educational difficulties, with more severe difficulties noted following meningoencephalitis and septic illness. These results highlight the importance of future studies on cognition and educational outcome incorporating type of illness as a moderating factor.
评估儿童重症监护病房(PICU)住院后短期神经心理学功能和学业成绩,并探讨关键神经系统和全身感染的作用。
前瞻性观察性病例对照研究。
2 个 PICU。
2007 年至 2010 年期间因脑膜炎、败血症或其他严重疾病住院的 88 名 5-16 岁(中位数年龄=10.00,四分位距=6.00-13.00)连续患儿。他们在出院后 3-6 个月接受评估,并将其表现与 100 名健康对照者进行比较。患儿均无先前的神经或神经发育障碍。
无。
获取了包括人口统计学和危重病详细信息的数据,并使用智力功能、记忆和注意力测试对儿童进行评估。教师通过问卷评估学业成绩。调整协变量后,与健康对照组相比,PICU 入院患儿在神经心理学测试中表现明显较差(p<0.02)。与对照组相比,教师认为更多的 PICU 入院患儿学习成绩更差,学习有困难(p=0.001),并且在执行功能和注意力等方面表现低于平均水平(p<0.04)。分析疾病类型对结果的影响发现,与脑膜炎和败血症患儿相比,神经心理学功能的某些方面,如记忆功能和教师评定的学业成绩,受影响最大。在 PICU 组中,多变量线性回归显示,当患儿年龄较小、社会阶层较低且在住院期间出现癫痫发作时,神经心理损害综合评分上表现更差的情况更为常见(p<0.02)。
入住 PICU 后,神经心理学表现和教育困难,脑膜炎和败血症后更严重。这些结果强调了未来研究认知和教育结果时,将疾病类型作为调节因素的重要性。