ICMR Chair in Public Health Research, Centre for Rural Development & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2012 Dec;136(6):907-25.
Malaria control in India has occupied high priority in health sector consuming major resources of the Central and State governments. Several new initiatives were launched from time to time supported by foreign aids but malaria situation has remained static and worsened in years of good rainfall. At times malaria relented temporarily but returned with vengeance at the local, regional and national level, becoming more resilient by acquiring resistance in the vectors and the parasites. National developments to improve the economy, without health impact assessment, have had adverse consequences by providing enormous breeding grounds for the vectors that have become refractory to interventions. As a result, malaria prospers and its control is in dilemma, as finding additional resources is becoming difficult with the ongoing financial crisis. Endemic countries must contribute to make up the needed resources, if malaria is to be contained. Malaria control requires long term planning, one that will reduce receptivity and vulnerability, and uninterrupted financial support for sustained interventions. While this seems to be a far cry, the environment is becoming more receptive for vectors, and epidemics visit the country diverting major resources in their containment, e.g. malaria, dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fevers, and Chikungunya virus infection. In the last six decades malaria has taken deep roots and diversified into various ecotypes, the control of these ecotypes requires local knowledge about the vectors and the parasites. In this review we outline the historical account of malaria and methods of control that have lifted the national economy in many countries. While battles against malaria should continue at the local level, there is a need for large scale environmental improvement. Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has provided huge funds for malaria control worldwide touching US$ 2 billion in 2011. Unfortunately it is likely to decline to US$ 1.5 billion in the coming years against the annual requirement of US$ 5 billion. While appreciating the foreign assistance, we wish to highlight the fact that unless we have internal strength of resources and manpower, sustained battles against malaria may face serious problems in achieving the final goal of malaria elimination.
印度的疟疾控制在卫生部门占据着很高的优先级,消耗了中央和邦政府的主要资源。在外国援助的支持下,印度不时推出一些新的举措,但疟疾情况一直处于静态,在降雨良好的年份还恶化了。有时疟疾会暂时缓解,但又会在地方、地区和国家层面上卷土重来,通过在病媒和寄生虫中获得耐药性而变得更具弹性。印度为改善经济而进行的国家发展,如果没有进行健康影响评估,就会产生不利后果,因为这为病媒提供了巨大的滋生地,使其对干预措施产生了抗药性。因此,疟疾得以繁荣,其控制陷入困境,因为在当前金融危机下,寻找额外资源变得越来越困难。如果要控制疟疾,流行国家必须提供所需资源。疟疾控制需要长期规划,以降低易感性和脆弱性,并为持续干预提供不间断的财政支持。虽然这似乎遥不可及,但环境对病媒变得更加有利,疟疾、登革热和登革热出血热以及基孔肯雅病毒感染等疾病的流行会转移该国的主要资源来进行控制。在过去的六十年里,疟疾已经深深扎根,并发展成各种生态型,控制这些生态型需要了解病媒和寄生虫的本地知识。在这篇综述中,我们概述了疟疾的历史和控制方法,这些方法在许多国家都推动了国民经济的发展。虽然在地方一级应该继续与疟疾作斗争,但还需要进行大规模的环境改善。全球抗击艾滋病、结核病和疟疾基金为全球疟疾控制提供了巨额资金,2011 年达到 20 亿美元。不幸的是,在未来几年,它可能会下降到 15 亿美元,而疟疾每年需要 50 亿美元。在感谢外国援助的同时,我们希望强调这样一个事实,即除非我们拥有内部资源和人力的实力,否则在实现消除疟疾的最终目标方面,持续抗击疟疾可能会面临严重问题。