Dr. Eric Jackman Institute of Child Study, University of Toronto.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1457-67. doi: 10.1037/a0031631. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
Face processing has been studied for decades. However, most of the empirical investigations have been conducted using static face images as stimuli. Little is known about whether static face processing findings can be generalized to real-world contexts in which faces are constantly moving. The present study investigated the nature of face processing (holistic vs. part-based) in elastic moving faces. Specifically, we focused on whether elastic moving faces, as compared with static ones, can facilitate holistic or part-based face processing. Using the composite paradigm, we asked participants to remember either an elastic moving face (i.e., a face that blinks and chews) or a static face, and then tested with a static composite face. The composite effect was (a) significantly smaller in the dynamic condition than in the static condition, (b) consistently found with different face encoding times (Experiments 1-3), and (c) present for the recognition of both upper and lower face parts (Experiment 4). These results suggest that elastic facial motion facilitates part-based processing rather than holistic processing. Thus, whereas previous work with static faces has emphasized an important role for holistic processing, the current work highlights an important role for featural processing with moving faces.
面孔处理已经研究了几十年。然而,大多数经验调查都是使用静态面孔图像作为刺激进行的。对于静态面孔处理的发现是否可以推广到现实世界中不断移动的面孔的真实环境中,人们知之甚少。本研究探讨了弹性移动面孔中的面孔处理(整体与局部)的本质。具体来说,我们专注于与静态面孔相比,弹性移动面孔是否可以促进整体或局部的面孔处理。使用复合范式,我们要求参与者记住弹性移动的面孔(即眨眼和咀嚼的面孔)或静态面孔,然后用静态复合面孔进行测试。与静态条件相比,动态条件下的复合效应(a)明显较小,(b)在不同的面孔编码时间(实验 1-3)中始终存在,(c)在识别上下面孔部分时均存在(实验 4)。这些结果表明,弹性面部运动促进了基于局部的处理,而不是整体处理。因此,虽然以前使用静态面孔的工作强调了整体处理的重要作用,但目前的工作强调了运动面孔的特征处理的重要作用。