Suppr超能文献

CTSA 联盟使用社区参与咨询服务报告。

Report on CTSA consortium use of the community engagement consulting service.

机构信息

UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12006. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The CTSA Community Engagement Consultative Service (CECS) is a national partnership designed to improve community engaged research (CEnR) through expert consultation. This report assesses the feasibility of CECS and presents findings from 2008 to 2009.

METHODOLOGY

A coordinating center and five regional coordinating sites managed the service. CTSAs identified a primary previsit CE best practice for consultants to address and completed self-assessments, postvisit evaluations, and action plans. Feasibility was assessed as the percent of CTSAs participating and completing evaluations. Frequencies were calculated for evaluation responses.

RESULTS

Of the 38 CTSAs, 36 (95%) completed a self-assessment. Of these 36 sites, 83%, 53%, and 44% completed a consultant visit, evaluation, and action plan, respectively, and 56% of the consultants completed an evaluation. The most common best practice identified previsit was improvement in CEnR (addressing outcomes that matter); however, relationship building with communities was most commonly addressed during consulting visits. Although 90% of the consultants were very confident sites could develop an action plan, only 35% were very confident in the CTSAs' abilities to implement one.

CONCLUSIONS

Academic medical centers interested in collaborating with communities and translating research to improve health need to further develop their capacity for CE and CEnR within their institutions.

摘要

简介

CTSA 社区参与咨询服务(CECS)是一个国家合作项目,旨在通过专家咨询来提高社区参与式研究(CEnR)。本报告评估了 CECS 的可行性,并介绍了 2008 年至 2009 年的调查结果。

方法

一个协调中心和五个区域协调地点管理该服务。CTSA 确定了顾问要解决的主要预访 CE 最佳实践,并完成了自我评估、访问后评估和行动计划。可行性评估的依据是参与并完成评估的 CTSA 的百分比。对评估结果进行了频率计算。

结果

在 38 个 CTSA 中,有 36 个(95%)完成了自我评估。在这 36 个站点中,分别有 83%、53%和 44%完成了顾问访问、评估和行动计划,而 56%的顾问完成了评估。预访时确定的最常见的最佳实践是改善 CEnR(解决重要的结果);然而,在咨询访问期间,与社区建立关系是最常见的做法。尽管 90%的顾问非常有信心站点可以制定行动计划,但只有 35%的顾问对 CTSA 实施行动计划的能力非常有信心。

结论

有兴趣与社区合作并将研究转化为改善健康的学术医疗中心需要进一步在其机构内发展他们在 CE 和 CEnR 方面的能力。

相似文献

1
Report on CTSA consortium use of the community engagement consulting service.
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12006. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Institutional community engagement leader perspectives on supporting ethical community-engaged research.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 6;9(1):e27. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.1165. eCollection 2025.
3
Community engagement during COVID: A field report from seven CTSAs.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;5(1):e104. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.785.
6
Understanding the supports of and challenges to community engagement in the CTSAs.
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Apr;8(2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/cts.12205. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
8
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
10
Community engagement strategies in the original and renewal applications for CTSA grant funding.
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Feb;7(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/cts.12125. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

3
Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1111779. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111779. eCollection 2023.
4
Developing a community-engaged wheelchair exercise program for persons with MS: community advisory board formation and feedback.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1385-1392. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2010819. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
A capacity building program to promote CBPR partnerships between academic researchers and community members.
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Dec;4(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00362.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
2
Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2094-102. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
3
Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug;100(8):1380-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
4
Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research.
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Feb;3(1):19-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00179.x.
6
Developing an academic-community partnership for research in prostate cancer.
J Cancer Educ. 2006 Summer;21(2):99-103. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2102_13.
7
Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities.
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul;7(3):312-23. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289376. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
8
Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Jul;17(2):141-51. doi: 10.1080/13576280410001710969.
9
An interactive and contextual model of community-university collaborations for research and action.
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Feb;32(1):84-101. doi: 10.1177/1090198104269512.
10
The East Side Village Health Worker Partnership: integrating research with action to reduce health disparities.
Public Health Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;116(6):548-57. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.6.548.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验