UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12006. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
The CTSA Community Engagement Consultative Service (CECS) is a national partnership designed to improve community engaged research (CEnR) through expert consultation. This report assesses the feasibility of CECS and presents findings from 2008 to 2009.
A coordinating center and five regional coordinating sites managed the service. CTSAs identified a primary previsit CE best practice for consultants to address and completed self-assessments, postvisit evaluations, and action plans. Feasibility was assessed as the percent of CTSAs participating and completing evaluations. Frequencies were calculated for evaluation responses.
Of the 38 CTSAs, 36 (95%) completed a self-assessment. Of these 36 sites, 83%, 53%, and 44% completed a consultant visit, evaluation, and action plan, respectively, and 56% of the consultants completed an evaluation. The most common best practice identified previsit was improvement in CEnR (addressing outcomes that matter); however, relationship building with communities was most commonly addressed during consulting visits. Although 90% of the consultants were very confident sites could develop an action plan, only 35% were very confident in the CTSAs' abilities to implement one.
Academic medical centers interested in collaborating with communities and translating research to improve health need to further develop their capacity for CE and CEnR within their institutions.
CTSA 社区参与咨询服务(CECS)是一个国家合作项目,旨在通过专家咨询来提高社区参与式研究(CEnR)。本报告评估了 CECS 的可行性,并介绍了 2008 年至 2009 年的调查结果。
一个协调中心和五个区域协调地点管理该服务。CTSA 确定了顾问要解决的主要预访 CE 最佳实践,并完成了自我评估、访问后评估和行动计划。可行性评估的依据是参与并完成评估的 CTSA 的百分比。对评估结果进行了频率计算。
在 38 个 CTSA 中,有 36 个(95%)完成了自我评估。在这 36 个站点中,分别有 83%、53%和 44%完成了顾问访问、评估和行动计划,而 56%的顾问完成了评估。预访时确定的最常见的最佳实践是改善 CEnR(解决重要的结果);然而,在咨询访问期间,与社区建立关系是最常见的做法。尽管 90%的顾问非常有信心站点可以制定行动计划,但只有 35%的顾问对 CTSA 实施行动计划的能力非常有信心。
有兴趣与社区合作并将研究转化为改善健康的学术医疗中心需要进一步在其机构内发展他们在 CE 和 CEnR 方面的能力。