How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.
作者信息
Bornmann Lutz, Marx Werner
机构信息
Division for Science & Innovation Studies, Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society, Munich, Germany.
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2013 Mar 1;14(3):226-30. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.9. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.研究到底有多好？用百分位数衡量出版物的被引影响力可提高评估的准确性和比较的公平性。
EMBO Rep. 2013 Mar 1;14(3):226-30. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.9. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
2
Enhancing the scientific and internationalization levels of the Circulation Journal.
Circ J. 2012;76(1):1-2. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-88-0027. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
3
Response to 'How good is research really?'.对《研究到底有多好？》的回应
EMBO Rep. 2013 Jun;14(6):493. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.60. Epub 2013 May 14.
4
Impact factor and other standardized measures of journal citation: a perspective.期刊引用的影响因子及其他标准化指标：一种观点
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):81-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.49072.
5
Comments to the response of Rodríguez-Navarro.对罗德里格斯 - 纳瓦罗回复的评论。
EMBO Rep. 2013 Jun;14(6):493-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.63. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
100 Disruptive Publications in Breast Cancer Research.乳腺癌研究中的100篇突破性论文。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Aug 1;22(8):2385-2389. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.8.2385.
7
Toxins: State of the Journal Report, 2017.毒素：《期刊报告》状况，2017年
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Feb 4;9(2):55. doi: 10.3390/toxins9020055.
8
Ball and chain.累赘。
Nat Immunol. 2010 Oct;11(10):873. doi: 10.1038/ni1010-873.
9
Bibliometric indices: defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals.文献计量指标：定义研究人员、部门和期刊的学术生产力和引文率。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Feb;10(2):102-106. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013265. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
10
The journal and 2011: a time for stocktaking.《期刊》与2011年：盘点之时。
Chest. 2011 Jan;139(1):2-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3010.
引用本文的文献
1
Economic Equity and People with Disabilities: Development and Characterization of a Novel Index.经济公平与残疾人：一种新型指数的开发与特征描述
Am J Econ Sociol. 2023 Nov;83(2):445-461. doi: 10.1111/ajes.12553.
2
Quantity over quality of publications: Are we using the right metrics to judge author's productivity and impact in biomedical research?出版物数量优于质量：我们是否使用了正确的指标来衡量生物医学研究中作者的生产力和影响力？
J Postgrad Med. 2024 Jul 1;70(3):154-161. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_343_24. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Evaluation of a non-auditory neurocognitive test battery in hearing-impaired according to age.根据年龄对听力受损者进行非听觉神经认知测试组合的评估。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):2941-2949. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08408-9. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Scientometrics and academia.科学计量学与学术界。
Biomol Biomed. 2024 Mar 11;24(2):207-209. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.10173.
5
A new tool for evaluating health equity in academic journals; the Diversity Factor.学术期刊中评估健康公平性的一种新工具；多样性因素。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 14;3(8):e0002252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002252. eCollection 2023.
6
Citation impact and reach of the IOC sport and exercise medicine consensus statements.国际奥委会运动与运动医学共识声明的引用影响力及传播范围。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Feb 1;9(1):e001460. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001460. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks.评估传播和实施研究框架的引文网络。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 28;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0628-2.
8
Initial Outcomes for the NHLBI K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Program in Relation to Long-Standing Career Development Programs: Implications for Trainees, Mentors, and Institutions.NHLBI K99/R00 独立生涯计划与长期职业发展计划的初步结果比较：对学员、导师和机构的启示。
Circ Res. 2016 Sep 30;119(8):904-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309238.
9
Publication Speed, Reporting Metrics, and Citation Impact of Cardiovascular Trials Supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.由美国国立心肺血液研究所资助的心血管试验的发表速度、报告指标和引用影响力
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 31;4(8):e002292. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002292.
10
Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.预测投资的生产力回报：美国国立心肺血液研究所三十年的同行评审、资助拨款及高被引论文发表情况
Circ Res. 2015 Jul 17;117(3):239-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306830. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
本文引用的文献
1
A bibliometric analysis of NOAA's Office of Ocean Exploration and Research.美国国家海洋和大气管理局海洋探索与研究办公室的文献计量分析。
Scientometrics. 2013 May;95(2):629-644. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0836-0. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
2
Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics.期刊影响因子和替代计量指标的多样性、价值和局限性。
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jul;32(7):1861-7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2276-1. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
3
Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.质量与数量：评估个体研究绩效。
Sci Transl Med. 2011 May 25;3(84):84cm13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249.
4
Metrics: journal's impact factor skewed by a single paper.指标：期刊影响因子受单一论文影响而产生偏差。
Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):179. doi: 10.1038/466179b.
5
How to improve the use of metrics.如何改进指标的使用。
Nature. 2010 Jun 17;465(7300):870-2. doi: 10.1038/465870a.
6
Metrics: A profusion of measures.指标：大量的测量方法。
Nature. 2010 Jun 17;465(7300):864-6. doi: 10.1038/465864a.
7
The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?h指数研究现状。h指数是衡量研究绩效的理想方式吗？
EMBO Rep. 2009 Jan;10(1):2-6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.233. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
8
The demise of the lone author.独立作者的消亡。
Nature. 2007 Dec 20;450(7173):1165. doi: 10.1038/4501165a.
9
Cash-per-publication..每篇出版物的费用
Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):786. doi: 10.1038/441786a.
10
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.期刊影响因子的历史与意义
JAMA. 2006 Jan 4;295(1):90-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
Zotero 插件