VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA.
J Nurs Educ. 2013 May;52(5):245-52. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130213-02. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
This systematic review provides a comprehensive assessment of models used to expand the ranks of clinical nursing faculty. Nursing faculty shortages constrict the pipeline for educating nurses and make addressing the projected nursing shortage more difficult. Schools of nursing have denied admission to qualified applicants, citing insufficient numbers of nursing faculty as one major reason. Using key search terms in PubMed(®) and CINAHL(®), we identified 14 peer-reviewed articles published between 1980 and 2010 about models for expanding clinical faculty. Partnership models (n = 11) and expanded use of faculty resources (n = 9) were the most common strategies. Few (n = 8) studies assessed program efficacy. A need was identified for studies to assess the effect of alternative models on educational capacity and student performance and to examine the subcomponents of academic-practice partnerships and other innovative approaches to understand the essential factors necessary to implement successful programs.
这篇系统综述全面评估了用于扩充临床护理教师队伍的模型。护理教师短缺限制了护士教育的渠道,使得解决预计的护士短缺问题更加困难。护理学院拒绝了合格申请人的入学申请,将护理教师人数不足作为主要原因之一。我们使用 PubMed(®) 和 CINAHL(®) 中的关键搜索词,确定了 1980 年至 2010 年期间发表的 14 篇关于扩充临床教师模型的同行评审文章。伙伴关系模型(n = 11)和扩大教师资源的使用(n = 9)是最常见的策略。很少有(n = 8)研究评估了方案的效果。需要评估替代模型对教育能力和学生表现的影响,并研究学术-实践伙伴关系的组成部分和其他创新方法,以了解实施成功计划所需的基本要素。