Nowell Lorelli, White Deborah E, Mrklas Kelly, Norris Jill M
Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 21;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0007-5.
Mentorship is perceived as vital to attracting, training, and retaining nursing faculty members and to maintaining high-quality education programs. While there is emerging evidence to support the value of mentorship in academic medicine, the extant state of the evidence for mentorship in nursing academia has not been established. We describe a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review to critically appraise the evidence for mentorship in nursing academia.
Studies examining the effectiveness of mentorship interventions with nursing faculty who teach in registered nursing education programs will be included. Mentee, mentor, and nursing education institutional outcomes will be explored. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method studies will be eligible for inclusion, without restrictions on publication status, year of publication, or language. We will search electronic databases (for example, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC) and gray literature (for example, conference proceedings, key journals, relevant organizational websites) for relevant citations. Using pilot-tested screening and data extraction forms, two reviewers will independently review the studies in three steps: (1) abstract/title screening, (2) full-text screening of accepted studies, and (3) data extraction of accepted studies. Studies will be aggregated for meta-synthesis (qualitative) and meta-analysis (quantitative), should the data permit.
This study is the first systematic review of existing global evidence for mentorship in nursing academia. It will help identify key evidence gaps and inform the development and implementation of mentorship interventions. The mentorship outcomes that result from this review could be used to guide the practice of mentorship to increase positive outcomes for nursing faculty and the students they teach and ultimately effect improvements for the patients they care for. This review will also identify key considerations for future research on mentorship in nursing academia and the enhancement of nursing science.
指导被认为对于吸引、培养和留住护理教员以及维持高质量教育项目至关重要。虽然有新证据支持指导在学术医学中的价值,但护理学术界指导的现有证据状况尚未明确。我们描述了一项混合方法系统评价方案,以批判性地评估护理学术界指导的证据。
将纳入研究指导干预对在注册护理教育项目中授课的护理教员有效性的研究。将探讨受指导者、指导者和护理教育机构的成果。定量、定性和混合方法研究均符合纳入条件,不受出版状态、出版年份或语言限制。我们将在电子数据库(如MEDLINE、CINAHL、ERIC)和灰色文献(如会议论文集、关键期刊、相关组织网站)中搜索相关引文。使用经过预试验的筛选和数据提取表格,两名评审员将分三步独立评审研究:(1)摘要/标题筛选,(2)对入选研究进行全文筛选,(3)对入选研究进行数据提取。如有数据支持,将对研究进行汇总以进行元综合(定性)和元分析(定量)。
本研究是对护理学术界指导的现有全球证据的首次系统评价。它将有助于识别关键证据空白,并为指导干预的制定和实施提供信息。本次评价得出的指导成果可用于指导指导实践,以增加护理教员及其所教学生的积极成果,并最终改善他们所护理患者的情况。本评价还将确定护理学术界未来指导研究和护理科学发展的关键考虑因素。