Suppr超能文献

心理社会压力对情景记忆更新的影响。

Effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd, Psychology Bldg Room 312, P.O. Box 210068, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Apr;226(4):769-79. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-2998-8. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

Abstract

RATIONALE

When a consolidated memory is reactivated, it becomes labile and modifiable. Recently, updating of reactivated episodic memory was demonstrated by Hupbach et al. (Learn Mem 14:47-53, 2007). Memory updating involves two vital processes-reactivation followed by reconsolidation. Here, we explored effects of psychosocial stress on episodic memory updating. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that stress before reactivation or stress before reconsolidation would impair memory updating.

METHODS

Participants learned a set of objects (list 1) on day 1. On day 2, some participants were reminded of list 1 before learning a second set of objects (list 2). Memory for list 1 was tested on day 3. Stress was administered either before reactivation of list 1 on day 2 (exp 1) or before reconsolidation of list 1, i.e., after reactivation and learning list 2 on day 2 (exp 2).

RESULTS

Memory updating involves the incorporation of list 2 items into list 1 memory, contingent upon the reactivation of list 1 memory. In exp 1, the reminder groups had higher intrusions than the no-reminder groups, but contrary to our predictions, stress did not reduce this reminder effect. Stress effects were, however, found in exp 2: the reminder group that was stressed after reactivation and new learning showed fewer intrusions than the control reminder group.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that stress before reactivation does not impair memory updating but stress at the onset of reconsolidation can. Timing may determine the effects of stress on memory processing.

摘要

背景

当一个整合的记忆被重新激活时,它变得不稳定和可修改。最近,Hupbach 等人证明了重新激活的情景记忆可以被更新。记忆更新涉及两个关键过程——重新激活和再巩固。在这里,我们探讨了心理社会应激对情景记忆更新的影响。基于先前的研究,我们假设在重新激活之前或在再巩固之前的应激会损害记忆更新。

方法

参与者在第 1 天学习一组物体(列表 1)。在第 2 天,一些参与者在学习第二组物体(列表 2)之前被提醒列表 1。在第 3 天测试对列表 1 的记忆。应激要么在第 2 天重新激活列表 1 之前施加(实验 1),要么在重新激活和学习列表 2 之后的列表 1 再巩固之前施加(实验 2)。

结果

记忆更新涉及将列表 2 中的项目纳入列表 1 记忆中,这取决于列表 1 记忆的重新激活。在实验 1 中,提醒组的侵入性比无提醒组高,但与我们的预测相反,应激并没有降低这种提醒效应。然而,在实验 2 中发现了应激效应:在重新激活和新学习后应激的提醒组比对照提醒组的侵入性更小。

结论

这些发现表明,在重新激活之前的应激不会损害记忆更新,但再巩固开始时的应激可以。时间可能决定应激对记忆处理的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验