Chilenski Sarah M, Ang Patricia M, Greenberg Mark T, Feinberg Mark E, Spoth Richard
Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
, 135 E Nittany Ave, Suite 402, State College, PA, 16801, USA.
Prev Sci. 2014 Apr;15(2):125-137. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0347-5.
The current study examined the impact of the PROSPER delivery system for evidence-based prevention programs on multiple indicators of social capital in a rural and semi-rural community sample. Utilizing a randomized blocked design, 317 individuals in 28 communities across two states were interviewed at three time points over the course of 2.5 years. Bridging, linking, and the public life skills forms of social capital were assessed via community members' and leaders' reports on the perceptions of school functioning and the Cooperative Extension System, collaboration among organizations, communication and collaboration around youth problems, and other measures. Longitudinal mixed model results indicate significant improvements in some aspects of bridging and linking social capital in PROSPER intervention communities. Given the strength of the longitudinal and randomized research design, results advance prevention science by suggesting that community collaborative prevention initiatives can significantly impact community social capital in a rural and semi-rural sample. Future research should further investigate changes in social capital in different contexts and how changes in social capital relate to other intervention effects.
本研究考察了基于证据的预防项目的PROSPER交付系统对农村和半农村社区样本中社会资本多个指标的影响。采用随机区组设计,在两年半的时间里,对两个州28个社区的317名个体在三个时间点进行了访谈。通过社区成员和领导者对学校功能、合作推广系统的看法、组织间的合作、围绕青少年问题的沟通与合作以及其他措施的报告,对社会资本的桥梁型、连接型和公共生活技能形式进行了评估。纵向混合模型结果表明,PROSPER干预社区在桥梁型和连接型社会资本的某些方面有显著改善。鉴于纵向和随机研究设计的优势,研究结果表明社区协作预防举措可以对农村和半农村样本中的社区社会资本产生重大影响,从而推动了预防科学的发展。未来的研究应进一步调查不同背景下社会资本的变化,以及社会资本的变化与其他干预效果之间的关系。