Osso Diane, Kanani Nehal
Full-time faculty member at the Community College of Denver Dental Hygiene Program.
J Dent Hyg. 2013 Feb;87(1):10-8. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
Antiseptic mouth rinses are widely recommended and marketed to improve oral health. This article summarizes current studies on the comparative effectiveness of selected antiseptic mouth rinses in controlling plaque and gingivitis, as well as risks associated with daily exposure, including salivary flow rate, oral cancer and wear of composite restorations.
Electronic database searches were conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed to identify articles comparing the effectiveness of 4 commercially marketed antiseptic mouth rinses differing in active ingredients (0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, essential oils (menthol, thymol and eucalyptol) and methyl salicylate, 0.7% cetylpyridinium chloride and 20% aloe vera gel) for controlling plaque and gingivitis. Criteria for inclusion included controlled clinical trials and systematic reviews appearing in English language publications evaluating the comparative effectiveness of the mouth rinses in controlling plaque and gingivitis, as well as risks associated with daily usage.
The majority of studies have shown mouth rinses containing chlorhexidine gluconate or essential oils and methyl salicylate provide clinically significant anti-gingivitis and anti-plaque benefits. Cetylpyridinium chloride has been found to provide only limited clinical benefits compared to inactive control mouth rinse. Inadequate evidence is available to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of aloe vera gel. Chlorhexidine, essential oils and cetylpyridinium have been found to be safe. However, limited data are available on the effects of the mouth rinse on wear patterns of dental restorations. Studies reviewed reported no significant difference in salivary flow rate related to alcohol based mouth rinse.
Research supports the effectiveness of antiseptic mouth rinses in reducing plaque and gingivitis as an adjunct to home care. Insufficient evidence is available to support the claim that oral antiseptics can reduce the risk of developing periodontitis or the rate of progression of periodontitis.
抗菌漱口水被广泛推荐和销售以改善口腔健康。本文总结了当前关于所选抗菌漱口水在控制牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较有效性的研究,以及与每日使用相关的风险,包括唾液流速、口腔癌和复合树脂修复体的磨损。
使用谷歌学术和PubMed进行电子数据库检索,以识别比较4种市售抗菌漱口水(活性成分不同:0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定、精油(薄荷醇、百里酚和桉叶油)和水杨酸甲酯、0.7%西吡氯铵和20%芦荟凝胶)在控制牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面有效性的文章。纳入标准包括英文出版物中出现的对照临床试验和系统评价,评估漱口水在控制牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较有效性以及与每日使用相关的风险。
大多数研究表明,含有葡萄糖酸氯己定或精油和水杨酸甲酯的漱口水具有临床上显著的抗牙龈炎和抗牙菌斑益处。与无活性对照漱口水相比,已发现西吡氯铵仅提供有限的临床益处。评估芦荟凝胶临床有效性的证据不足。已发现氯己定、精油和西吡氯铵是安全的。然而,关于漱口水对牙齿修复体磨损模式影响的数据有限。所审查的研究报告称,与含酒精漱口水相关的唾液流速无显著差异。
研究支持抗菌漱口水作为家庭护理辅助手段在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的有效性。没有足够的证据支持口腔抗菌剂可降低患牙周炎风险或牙周炎进展速度的说法。