青少年吸烟。更高的消费税应能显著减少吸烟者数量。青少年吸烟的程度及后果。美国总审计局。 - Suppr | 超能文献

青少年吸烟。更高的消费税应能显著减少吸烟者数量。青少年吸烟的程度及后果。美国总审计局。 - Suppr | 超能文献

相似文献

1

Teenage smoking. Higher excise tax should significantly reduce the number of smokers. The extent and consequences of teenage smoking. United States General Accounting Office.青少年吸烟。更高的消费税应能显著减少吸烟者数量。青少年吸烟的程度及后果。美国总审计局。

J Fla Med Assoc. 1990 Apr;77(4):459-66.

2

Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model.增加税收作为减少香烟使用和死亡的策略：模拟模型的结果

Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):279-86. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0696.

3

Federal and state cigarette excise taxes - United States, 1995-2009.1995 - 2009年美国联邦和州香烟消费税

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 22;58(19):524-7.

4

Cigarette taxes. The straw to break the camel's back.香烟税。压垮骆驼的最后一根稻草。

Public Health Rep. 1997 Jul-Aug;112(4):290-7.

5

Increasing taxes to reduce smoking prevalence and smoking attributable mortality in Taiwan: results from a tobacco policy simulation model.提高税收以降低台湾地区的吸烟率和吸烟所致死亡率：烟草政策模拟模型的结果

Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i45-50. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005660.

6

Cigarette tax increase and media campaign cost of reducing smoking-related deaths.提高香烟税以及开展媒体宣传活动以降低与吸烟相关的死亡人数的成本。

Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jul;29(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.004.

7

Limiting youth access to tobacco: comparing the long-term health impacts of increasing cigarette excise taxes and raising the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States.限制青少年获取烟草：比较提高香烟消费税和将美国合法吸烟年龄提高到21岁对长期健康的影响

Health Policy. 2007 Mar;80(3):378-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 12.

8

Public health: tobacco taxes and Internet sales--2005. End of Year Issue Brief.公共卫生：烟草税与网络销售——2005年。年终问题简报。

Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2005 Dec 31:1-7.

9

Does increasing cigarette excise tax improve people's health? The cases of heart attacks and stroke.

J Health Care Finance. 2008 Spring;34(3):91-109.

10

The effect of cigarette excise taxes on smoking before, during and after pregnancy.香烟消费税对孕期及孕前、孕后吸烟行为的影响。

J Health Econ. 2003 Nov;22(6):1053-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.06.003.