• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的英国社会经济地位较低群体的饮食和身体活动干预措施:一项混合方法系统评价。

Community-based dietary and physical activity interventions in low socioeconomic groups in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.023
PMID:23454537
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and changes in diet and physical activity can prevent diabetes. We assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of community-based dietary and physical activity interventions among low-SES groups in the UK.

METHOD

We searched relevant databases and web resources from 1990 to November 2009 to identify relevant published and grey literature using an iterative approach, focusing on UK studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-five relevant papers (nine quantitative, 23 qualitative and three mixed methods studies) were data extracted, quality assessed and synthesised using narrative synthesis and thematic analysis. The relationship between interventions and barriers and facilitators was also examined. Dietary/nutritional, food retail, physical activity and multi-component interventions demonstrated mixed effectiveness. Qualitative studies indicated a range of barriers and facilitators, which spanned pragmatic, social and psychological issues. The more effective interventions used a range of techniques to address some surface-level psychological and pragmatic concerns, however many deeper-level social, psychological and pragmatic concerns were not addressed.

CONCLUSION

Evidence on the effectiveness of community-based dietary and physical activity interventions is inconclusive. A range of barriers and facilitators exist, some of which were addressed by interventions but some of which require consideration in future research.

摘要

目的

社会经济地位(SES)较低是 2 型糖尿病的一个风险因素,而改变饮食和身体活动可以预防糖尿病。我们评估了基于社区的饮食和身体活动干预措施在英国 SES 较低群体中的效果和可接受性。

方法

我们使用迭代方法,从 1990 年到 2009 年 11 月,从相关数据库和网络资源中搜索了相关的已发表和灰色文献,重点关注英国的研究。

结果

提取、质量评估和综合使用叙述性综合和主题分析了 35 篇相关论文(9 项定量、23 项定性和 3 项混合方法研究)。还检查了干预措施与障碍和促进因素之间的关系。饮食/营养、食品零售、身体活动和多组分干预措施显示出混合效果。定性研究表明存在一系列障碍和促进因素,这些因素涵盖了实际、社会和心理问题。更有效的干预措施使用了一系列技术来解决一些表面的心理和实际问题,但许多更深层次的社会、心理和实际问题仍未得到解决。

结论

基于社区的饮食和身体活动干预措施的有效性证据尚无定论。存在一系列障碍和促进因素,其中一些已被干预措施所解决,但仍需要在未来的研究中加以考虑。

相似文献

1
Community-based dietary and physical activity interventions in low socioeconomic groups in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review.基于社区的英国社会经济地位较低群体的饮食和身体活动干预措施:一项混合方法系统评价。
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilevel Diabetes Prevention Interventions to Address Population Inequities in Diabetes Risk: Scoping Review.解决糖尿病风险人群不平等问题的多层次糖尿病预防干预措施:范围审查
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Aug 25;11:e70267. doi: 10.2196/70267.
2
Contextual factors in systematic reviews: understanding public health interventions in low socioeconomic status and disadvantaged populations.系统评价中的背景因素:理解低社会经济地位和弱势群体中的公共卫生干预措施。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;83(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01644-x.
3
A policy assessment tool to identify causes of inequities that influence obesity prevalence.
一种用于识别影响肥胖流行率的不平等现象成因的政策评估工具。
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Jan 1;103(1):57-65. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292061. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
Digital behavioral dietary interventions to promote a healthy diet among children and adolescents: a scoping review of technologies, design, behavioral theory, and assessed outcomes.促进儿童和青少年健康饮食的数字行为饮食干预措施:技术、设计、行为理论及评估结果的范围综述
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024 Nov 29;12(1):2430965. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2430965. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors associated with health behaviors in preventing non-communicable diseases among older adults living alone in poverty in Japan.日本贫困独居老年人预防非传染性疾病的健康行为相关因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 8;11:1207334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1207334. eCollection 2023.
6
Barriers and facilitators to adopting healthier lifestyle among low-income women in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.在沙特阿拉伯,低收入女性采用更健康生活方式的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1202-1212. doi: 10.1111/hex.13735. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
7
Digital health interventions to improve eating behaviour of people with a lower socioeconomic position: a scoping review of behaviour change techniques.改善社会经济地位较低人群饮食行为的数字健康干预措施:行为改变技术的范围综述
BMC Nutr. 2022 Dec 8;8(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40795-022-00635-3.
8
Social influences on physical activity for establishing criteria leading to exercise persistence.社会影响对建立导致锻炼坚持的标准的身体活动的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 19;17(10):e0274259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274259. eCollection 2022.
9
A Community-Based Participatory Action Research with Women from Disadvantaged Populations: Strengths and Weaknesses of a Multiple Health Behaviour Change Intervention.基于社区的参与式行动研究:弱势妇女群体的多种健康行为改变干预措施的优势与不足。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;19(11):6830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116830.
10
Reducing lifestyle risk behaviours in disadvantaged groups in high-income countries: A scoping review of systematic reviews.减少高收入国家弱势群体中的生活方式风险行为:系统评价的范围综述。
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106916. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106916. Epub 2021 Dec 16.