School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK.
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and changes in diet and physical activity can prevent diabetes. We assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of community-based dietary and physical activity interventions among low-SES groups in the UK.
We searched relevant databases and web resources from 1990 to November 2009 to identify relevant published and grey literature using an iterative approach, focusing on UK studies.
Thirty-five relevant papers (nine quantitative, 23 qualitative and three mixed methods studies) were data extracted, quality assessed and synthesised using narrative synthesis and thematic analysis. The relationship between interventions and barriers and facilitators was also examined. Dietary/nutritional, food retail, physical activity and multi-component interventions demonstrated mixed effectiveness. Qualitative studies indicated a range of barriers and facilitators, which spanned pragmatic, social and psychological issues. The more effective interventions used a range of techniques to address some surface-level psychological and pragmatic concerns, however many deeper-level social, psychological and pragmatic concerns were not addressed.
Evidence on the effectiveness of community-based dietary and physical activity interventions is inconclusive. A range of barriers and facilitators exist, some of which were addressed by interventions but some of which require consideration in future research.
社会经济地位(SES)较低是 2 型糖尿病的一个风险因素,而改变饮食和身体活动可以预防糖尿病。我们评估了基于社区的饮食和身体活动干预措施在英国 SES 较低群体中的效果和可接受性。
我们使用迭代方法,从 1990 年到 2009 年 11 月,从相关数据库和网络资源中搜索了相关的已发表和灰色文献,重点关注英国的研究。
提取、质量评估和综合使用叙述性综合和主题分析了 35 篇相关论文(9 项定量、23 项定性和 3 项混合方法研究)。还检查了干预措施与障碍和促进因素之间的关系。饮食/营养、食品零售、身体活动和多组分干预措施显示出混合效果。定性研究表明存在一系列障碍和促进因素,这些因素涵盖了实际、社会和心理问题。更有效的干预措施使用了一系列技术来解决一些表面的心理和实际问题,但许多更深层次的社会、心理和实际问题仍未得到解决。
基于社区的饮食和身体活动干预措施的有效性证据尚无定论。存在一系列障碍和促进因素,其中一些已被干预措施所解决,但仍需要在未来的研究中加以考虑。