School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056437. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
Group-living primates frequently interact with each other to maintain social bonds as well as to compete for valuable resources. Observing such social interactions between group members provides individuals with essential information (e.g. on the fighting ability or altruistic attitude of group companions) to guide their social tactics and choice of social partners. This process requires individuals to selectively attend to the most informative content within a social scene. It is unclear how non-human primates allocate attention to social interactions in different contexts, and whether they share similar patterns of social attention to humans. Here we compared the gaze behaviour of rhesus macaques and humans when free-viewing the same set of naturalistic images. The images contained positive or negative social interactions between two conspecifics of different phylogenetic distance from the observer; i.e. affiliation or aggression exchanged by two humans, rhesus macaques, Barbary macaques, baboons or lions. Monkeys directed a variable amount of gaze at the two conspecific individuals in the images according to their roles in the interaction (i.e. giver or receiver of affiliation/aggression). Their gaze distribution to non-conspecific individuals was systematically varied according to the viewed species and the nature of interactions, suggesting a contribution of both prior experience and innate bias in guiding social attention. Furthermore, the monkeys' gaze behavior was qualitatively similar to that of humans, especially when viewing negative interactions. Detailed analysis revealed that both species directed more gaze at the face than the body region when inspecting individuals, and attended more to the body region in negative than in positive social interactions. Our study suggests that monkeys and humans share a similar pattern of role-sensitive, species- and context-dependent social attention, implying a homologous cognitive mechanism of social attention between rhesus macaques and humans.
群居灵长类动物经常相互作用,以维持社会关系并争夺有价值的资源。观察群体成员之间的这种社会互动为个体提供了重要信息(例如,关于群体同伴的战斗能力或利他态度),以指导他们的社交策略和选择社交伙伴。这个过程要求个体选择性地关注社交场景中最具信息量的内容。目前尚不清楚非人类灵长类动物如何在不同的环境中分配注意力,以及它们是否与人类有相似的社交注意力模式。在这里,我们比较了恒河猴和人类在自由观看同一组自然图像时的注视行为。这些图像包含了来自观察者不同进化距离的两种同种动物之间的积极或消极的社会互动;即两个人类、恒河猴、巴巴里猕猴、狒狒或狮子之间交换的亲和或攻击。猴子会根据互动中他们的角色(即亲和/攻击的给予者或接受者),向图像中的两个同种个体注视可变数量的目光。他们对非同种个体的注视分布根据所观察的物种和互动的性质而系统地变化,这表明在指导社交注意力时,既有先前的经验,也有先天的偏见。此外,猴子的注视行为在质上与人类相似,尤其是在观看负面互动时。详细分析表明,当观察个体时,两种物种都将更多的目光投向面部而不是身体区域,并且在负面的社会互动中比在积极的社会互动中更多地关注身体区域。我们的研究表明,猴子和人类共享一种类似的角色敏感、物种和情境依赖的社交注意力模式,这意味着恒河猴和人类之间存在同源的社交注意力认知机制。