*Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Departments of Surgery †Radiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):1014-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318281eda3.
Systematic segmentectomy is useful in treating small hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver. However, accomplishment of an exact systematic segmentectomy still remains a challenging procedure because of the variable anatomy of portal branches. We evaluated the usefulness of the dye injection method for systematic segmentectomy, which focuses on the various patterns of portal vein (PV) branches feeding the tumor.
From January 2001 to May 2011, systematic segmentectomy by the dye injection method was performed in 70 patients. We evaluated the efficiency of systematic segmentectomy by ultrasonogram-guided dye injection into the portal branches that feed the tumor-bearing segments. The type of tumor-feeding PV branch, perioperative outcome, and survival rates were analyzed retrospectively.
There were variations in the PV branches that fed the masses in 70 patients in whom the dye injection method for anatomical segmentectomy was tried. Forty masses (54.8%) were fed by a single main PV branch (type 1), 17 masses (23.3%) by a couple of PV branches (type 2), and 11 masses (15.1%) were supplied partially by single PV branch (type 3). In 5 patients (7.1%), masses were supplied by several small distributed PVs (type 4). For types 1 and 2, the tumor-bearing segments were resected anatomically with the help of staining; type 3 was partially stained and as the opposite side was not discrete, it was demarcated through counterstaining; and in type 4, dye injection could not be performed. Anatomical systematic segmentectomy was obtained in types 1 to 3; however, nonanatomical resection was inevitable for type 4. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 80.5% and 67.2%, respectively, and the 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 61.5% and 42.5%, respectively. The anatomical segmentectomy group showed better overall and disease-free survival than the nonanatomical group, even though it is not significant statistically.
Systematic segmentectomy by the dye injection method overcomes the variation in PV tributaries in the segments and can be done according to the natural branching pattern of PVs.
系统节段切除术在治疗肝硬化小肝癌方面非常有效。然而,由于门静脉(PV)分支的解剖结构存在差异,准确完成系统节段切除术仍然是一项具有挑战性的手术。我们评估了染料注射法在系统节段切除术中的应用价值,该方法侧重于肿瘤供血的 PV 分支的各种模式。
自 2001 年 1 月至 2011 年 5 月,对 70 例患者进行了染料注射法的系统节段切除术。我们通过超声引导向供应肿瘤的 PV 分支内注射染料,评估了系统节段切除术的效率。回顾性分析肿瘤供血 PV 分支的类型、围手术期结果和生存率。
在 70 例尝试解剖性节段切除术的患者中,PV 分支存在不同的肿瘤供血模式。40 个肿块(54.8%)由单一主 PV 分支供血(1 型),17 个肿块(23.3%)由多个 PV 分支供血(2 型),11 个肿块(15.1%)由单个 PV 分支部分供血(3 型)。在 5 例患者(7.1%)中,肿块由多个分布较小的 PV 供血(4 型)。对于 1 型和 2 型,在染色的帮助下解剖性切除肿瘤所在的节段;3 型为部分染色,由于对侧不明显,通过反染色进行划定;而 4 型无法进行染料注射。1 型至 3 型均获得解剖性系统节段切除术,但 4 型不可避免地需要非解剖性切除。3 年和 5 年的总生存率分别为 80.5%和 67.2%,3 年和 5 年无病生存率分别为 61.5%和 42.5%。解剖性节段切除术组的总生存率和无病生存率均优于非解剖性组,但差异无统计学意义。
染料注射法的系统节段切除术克服了节段内 PV 分支的变异,可以根据 PV 的自然分支模式进行操作。