Risović Dubravko, Pavlović Zivko
Molecular Physics Laboratory, Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Scanning. 2013 Nov-Dec;35(6):402-11. doi: 10.1002/sca.21081. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Processing of gray scale images in order to determine the corresponding fractal dimension is very important due to widespread use of imaging technologies and application of fractal analysis in many areas of science, technology, and medicine. To this end, many methods for estimation of fractal dimension from gray scale images have been developed and routinely used. Unfortunately different methods (dimension estimators) often yield significantly different results in a manner that makes interpretation difficult. Here, we report results of comparative assessment of performance of several most frequently used algorithms/methods for estimation of fractal dimension. To that purpose, we have used scanning electron microscope images of aluminum oxide surfaces with different fractal dimensions. The performance of algorithms/methods was evaluated using the statistical Z-score approach. The differences between performances of six various methods are discussed and further compared with results obtained by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy on the same samples. The analysis of results shows that the performance of investigated algorithms varies considerably and that systematically erroneous fractal dimensions could be estimated using certain methods. The differential cube counting, triangulation, and box counting algorithms showed satisfactory performance in the whole investigated range of fractal dimensions. Difference statistic is proved to be less reliable generating 4% of unsatisfactory results. The performances of the Power spectrum, Partitioning and EIS were unsatisfactory in 29%, 38%, and 75% of estimations, respectively. The results of this study should be useful and provide guidelines to researchers using/attempting fractal analysis of images obtained by scanning microscopy or atomic force microscopy.
由于成像技术的广泛应用以及分形分析在科学、技术和医学等许多领域的应用,处理灰度图像以确定相应的分形维数非常重要。为此,已经开发并经常使用许多从灰度图像估计分形维数的方法。不幸的是,不同的方法(维数估计器)常常会产生显著不同的结果,这使得解释变得困难。在这里,我们报告了几种最常用的分形维数估计算法/方法的性能比较评估结果。为此,我们使用了具有不同分形维数的氧化铝表面的扫描电子显微镜图像。使用统计Z分数方法评估算法/方法的性能。讨论了六种不同方法的性能差异,并进一步与同一样品上通过电化学阻抗谱获得的结果进行了比较。结果分析表明,所研究算法的性能差异很大,使用某些方法可能会系统地估计出错误的分形维数。差分立方体计数、三角测量和盒计数算法在所研究的整个分形维数范围内表现出令人满意的性能。差异统计被证明不太可靠,产生了4%的不满意结果。功率谱、分区和电化学阻抗谱的性能分别在29%、38%和75%的估计中不令人满意。本研究结果应该对使用/尝试对通过扫描显微镜或原子力显微镜获得的图像进行分形分析的研究人员有用,并为他们提供指导。