• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用进化多目标人工神经网络预测肝移植患者的生存情况。

Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Numerical Analysis, University of Córdoba, Rabanales Campus, Albert Einstein Building 3rd Floor, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.

出版信息

Artif Intell Med. 2013 May;58(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2013.02.004
PMID:23489761
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The optimal allocation of organs in liver transplantation is a problem that can be resolved using machine-learning techniques. Classical methods of allocation included the assignment of an organ to the first patient on the waiting list without taking into account the characteristics of the donor and/or recipient. In this study, characteristics of the donor, recipient and transplant organ were used to determine graft survival. We utilised a dataset of liver transplants collected by eleven Spanish hospitals that provides data on the survival of patients three months after their operations.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

To address the problem of organ allocation, the memetic Pareto evolutionary non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm 2 (MPENSGA2 algorithm), a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, was used to train radial basis function neural networks, where accuracy was the measure used to evaluate model performance, along with the minimum sensitivity measurement. The neural network models obtained from the Pareto fronts were used to develop a rule-based system. This system will help medical experts allocate organs.

RESULTS

The models obtained with the MPENSGA2 algorithm generally yielded competitive results for all performance metrics considered in this work, namely the correct classification rate (C), minimum sensitivity (MS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), root mean squared error (RMSE) and Cohen's kappa (Kappa). In general, the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm demonstrated a better performance than the mono-objective algorithm, especially with regard to the MS extreme of the Pareto front, which yielded the best values of MS (48.98) and AUC (0.5659). The rule-based system efficiently complements the current allocation system (model for end-stage liver disease, MELD) based on the principles of efficiency and equity. This complementary effect occurred in 55% of the cases used in the simulation. The proposed rule-based system minimises the prediction probability error produced by two sets of models (one of them formed by models guided by one of the objectives (entropy) and the other composed of models guided by the other objective (MS)), such that it maximises the probability of success in liver transplants, with success based on graft survival three months post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

The proposed rule-based system is objective, because it does not involve medical experts (the expert's decision may be biased by several factors, such as his/her state of mind or familiarity with the patient). This system is a useful tool that aids medical experts in the allocation of organs; however, the final allocation decision must be made by an expert.

摘要

目的

器官在肝移植中的最优分配是一个可以通过机器学习技术解决的问题。经典的分配方法包括将器官分配给等待名单上的第一位患者,而不考虑供体和/或受体的特征。在这项研究中,使用供体、受体和移植器官的特征来确定移植物的存活率。我们利用了由 11 家西班牙医院收集的肝移植数据集,该数据集提供了患者手术后三个月生存的数据。

方法与材料

为了解决器官分配问题,使用了多目标进化非支配排序遗传算法 2(MPENSGA2 算法),一种多目标进化算法,来训练径向基函数神经网络,其中准确性是评估模型性能的度量,同时还使用了最小灵敏度测量。从 Pareto 前沿获得的神经网络模型被用于开发基于规则的系统。这个系统将帮助医学专家分配器官。

结果

MPENSGA2 算法获得的模型通常在这项工作中考虑的所有性能指标上都取得了有竞争力的结果,即正确分类率(C)、最小灵敏度(MS)、接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)、均方根误差(RMSE)和 Cohen 的 kappa(Kappa)。一般来说,多目标进化算法的性能优于单目标算法,特别是在 Pareto 前沿的 MS 极端情况下,其产生了最佳的 MS(48.98)和 AUC(0.5659)值。基于效率和公平性原则,基于规则的系统有效地补充了当前的分配系统(终末期肝病模型,MELD)。在模拟中使用的 55%的病例中出现了这种互补效应。所提出的基于规则的系统最小化了两组模型(一组由一个目标(熵)指导的模型组成,另一组由另一个目标(MS)指导的模型组成)产生的预测概率误差,从而使肝脏移植的成功率最大化,成功基于移植后三个月的移植物存活率。

结论

所提出的基于规则的系统是客观的,因为它不涉及医学专家(专家的决策可能会受到多种因素的影响,例如他/她的心态或对患者的熟悉程度)。这个系统是一个有用的工具,可以帮助医学专家分配器官;然而,最终的分配决策必须由专家做出。

相似文献

1
Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.利用进化多目标人工神经网络预测肝移植患者的生存情况。
Artif Intell Med. 2013 May;58(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
2
Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative donor-recipient matching model for liver transplantation: results from a multicenter Spanish study.人工智能在肝移植中作为一种创新的供受者匹配模型的应用:来自多中心西班牙研究的结果。
J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(5):1020-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.05.039. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Predicting three-year kidney graft survival in recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus.预测系统性红斑狼疮患者肾移植 3 年的存活率。
ASAIO J. 2011 Jul-Aug;57(4):300-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318222db30.
4
Validation of artificial neural networks as a methodology for donor-recipient matching for liver transplantation.验证人工神经网络作为肝移植供体-受者匹配方法的研究。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Feb;24(2):192-203. doi: 10.1002/lt.24870.
5
A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.基于机器学习的方法对胸移植进行预后分析。
Artif Intell Med. 2010 May;49(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
6
Dynamically weighted evolutionary ordinal neural network for solving an imbalanced liver transplantation problem.用于解决不平衡肝移植问题的动态加权进化序数神经网络
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Mar;77:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy classification in survival prediction.多目标进化算法在生存预测中的模糊分类。
Artif Intell Med. 2014 Mar;60(3):197-219. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
8
Predicting the graft survival for heart-lung transplantation patients: an integrated data mining methodology.预测心肺移植患者的移植物存活率:一种综合数据挖掘方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Dec;78(12):e84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
9
Liver transplant recipient selection: MELD vs. clinical judgment.肝移植受者选择:终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与临床判断
Liver Transpl. 2005 Jun;11(6):621-6. doi: 10.1002/lt.20428.
10
Sensitivity versus accuracy in multiclass problems using memetic Pareto evolutionary neural networks.使用混合帕累托进化神经网络处理多类问题时的灵敏度与准确性
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2010 May;21(5):750-70. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2010.2041468. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
An In-depth overview of artificial intelligence (AI) tool utilization across diverse phases of organ transplantation.人工智能(AI)工具在器官移植不同阶段的应用深度概述。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06488-1.
2
Sarcopenia and frailty: An in-depth analysis of the pathophysiology and effect on liver transplant candidates.肌肉减少症与衰弱:对病理生理学及对肝移植候选者影响的深入分析。
World J Hepatol. 2025 May 27;17(5):106182. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.106182.
3
Transforming liver transplant allocation with artificial intelligence and machine learning: a systematic review.
利用人工智能和机器学习改变肝移植分配:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02890-3.
4
Classification-augmented survival estimation (CASE): A novel method for individualized long-term survival prediction with application to liver transplantation.分类增强生存估计(CASE):一种用于个体化长期生存预测的新方法及其在肝移植中的应用
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0315928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315928. eCollection 2025.
5
Smart match: revolutionizing organ allocation through artificial intelligence.智能匹配:通过人工智能革新器官分配
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Feb 28;7:1364149. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1364149. eCollection 2024.
6
Should AI allocate livers for transplant? Public attitudes and ethical considerations.人工智能是否应该分配肝脏进行移植?公众态度和伦理考虑。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 27;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00983-0.
7
Basic Understanding of Liver Transplant Immunology.肝脏移植免疫学基础认知
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Nov-Dec;13(6):1091-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
Artificial Intelligence Advances in Transplant Pathology.移植病理学中的人工智能进展
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 4;10(9):1041. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10091041.
9
Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation.人工智能:实体器官移植的现状和未来潜力。
Transpl Int. 2022 Jul 4;35:10640. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10640. eCollection 2022.
10
Israeli Medical Experts' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences in Allocating Donor Organs for Transplantation.以色列医学专家在器官分配移植方面的知识、态度和偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(11):6945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116945.