Suppr超能文献

哈佛锌磷水门汀与 Panavia F2 和 Rely X Plus 树脂水门汀对大鼠 L929 成纤维细胞细胞毒性的比较。

Cytotoxicity Comparison of Harvard Zinc Phosphate Cement Versus Panavia F2 and Rely X Plus Resin Cements on Rat L929-fibroblasts.

机构信息

1: Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Dental Research Centre, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Cell J. 2011 Fall;13(3):163-8. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Resin cements, regardless of their biocompatibility, have been widely used in restorative dentistry during the recent years. These cements contain hydroxy ethyl methacrylate (HEMA) molecules which are claimed to penetrate into dentinal tubules and may affect dental pulp. Since tooth preparation for metal ceramic restorations involves a large surface of the tooth, cytotoxicity of these cements would be more important in fixed prosthodontic treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of two resin cements (Panavia F2 and Rely X Plus) versus zinc phosphate cement (Harvard) using rat L929-fibroblasts in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this experimental study, ninety hollow glass cylinders (internal diameter 5-mm, height 2-mm) were made and divided into three groups. Each group was filled with one of three experimental cements; Harvard Zinc Phosphate cement, Panavia F2 resin cement and Rely X Plus resin cement. L929- Fibroblast were passaged and subsequently cultured in 6-well plates of 5×10(5) cells each. The culture medium was RPMI_ 1640. All samples were incubated in CO2. Using enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA) and (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (MTT) assay, the cytotoxicity of the cements was investigated at 1 hour, 24 hours and one week post exposure. Statistical analyses were performed via two-way ANOVA and honestly significant difference (HSD) Tukey tests.

RESULTS

This study revealed significant differences between the three cements at the different time intervals. Harvard cement displayed the greatest cytotoxicity at all three intervals. After 1 hour Panavia F2 showed the next greatest cytotoxicity, but after 24-hours and oneweek intervals Rely X Plus showed the next greatest cytotoxicity. The results further showed that cytotoxicity decreased significantly in the Panavia F2 group with time (p<0.005), cytotoxicity increased significantly in the Rely X Plus group with time (p<0.001), and the Harvard cement group failed to showed no noticeable change in cytotoxicity with time.

CONCLUSION

Although this study has limitations, it provides evidence that Harvard zinc phosphate cement is the most cytotoxic product and Panavia F2 appears to be the least cytotoxic cement over time.

摘要

目的

近年来,无论其生物相容性如何,树脂水门汀已广泛应用于修复牙科。这些水门汀含有羟乙基甲基丙烯酸酯(HEMA)分子,据称这些分子可渗透到牙本质小管中,并可能影响牙髓。由于金属陶瓷修复体的牙预备涉及牙齿的较大表面,因此这些水门汀的细胞毒性在固定义齿治疗中更为重要。本研究的目的是比较两种树脂水门汀(Panavia F2 和 Rely X Plus)与氧化锌磷酸酯水门汀(Harvard)对体外大鼠 L929 成纤维细胞的细胞毒性。

材料与方法

在这项实验研究中,制作了 90 个空心玻璃圆柱(内径 5mm,高 2mm),并将其分为三组。每组分别填充三种实验性水门汀之一:哈佛氧化锌磷酸酯水门汀、Panavia F2 树脂水门汀和 Rely X Plus 树脂水门汀。L929-成纤维细胞传代后,在每孔 5×10(5)个细胞的 6 孔板中培养。培养基为 RPMI_1640。所有样本均在 CO2 中孵育。通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和(3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴化物)(MTT)测定,在暴露后 1 小时、24 小时和 1 周时研究水门汀的细胞毒性。通过双向方差分析和诚实显著差异(HSD)Tukey 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

这项研究表明,在不同的时间间隔内,三种水门汀之间存在显著差异。哈佛水门汀在所有三个时间段均显示出最大的细胞毒性。在 1 小时后,Panavia F2 显示出下一个最大的细胞毒性,但在 24 小时和 1 周后,Rely X Plus 显示出下一个最大的细胞毒性。结果进一步表明,Panavia F2 组的细胞毒性随时间显著降低(p<0.005),Rely X Plus 组的细胞毒性随时间显著增加(p<0.001),而哈佛水门汀组的细胞毒性随时间无明显变化。

结论

尽管这项研究存在局限性,但它提供了证据表明哈佛氧化锌磷酸酯水门汀是最具细胞毒性的产品,而 Panavia F2 似乎随着时间的推移具有最小的细胞毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ab/3584464/54f1c3f0e607/Cell-J-13-163-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验