Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Aug 15;150(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.031. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
To compare the efficacy and safety of adjunctive quetiapine (QTP) versus placebo (PBO) for patients with bipolar II disorder (BDII) currently experiencing mixed hypomanic symptoms in a 2-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 8-week investigation.
Participants included 55 adults (age 18-65 years) who met criteria for BDII on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (SCID). Entrance criteria included a stable medication regimen for ≥2 weeks and hypomania with mixed symptoms (>12 on the Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] and >15 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] at two consecutive visits 1-3 days apart). Participants were randomly assigned to receive adjunctive quetiapine (n=30) or placebo (n=25).
Adjunctive quetiapine demonstrated significantly greater improvement than placebo in Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder Overall Severity scores (F(1)=10.12, p=.002) and MADRS scores (F(1)=6.93, p=.0138), but no significant differences were observed for YMRS scores (F(1)=3.68, p=.069). Side effects of quetiapine were consistent with those observed in previous clinical trials, with sedation/somnolence being the most common, occurring in 53.3% with QTP and 20.0% with PBO.
While QTP was significantly more effective than PBO for overall and depressive symptoms of BDII, there was no significant difference between groups in reducing symptoms of hypomania. Hypomania improved across both groups throughout the study.
比较辅助喹硫平(QTP)与安慰剂(PBO)治疗当前伴有混合性轻躁狂症状的双相障碍 II 型(BDII)患者的疗效和安全性。
55 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间的成年人参与了这项 2 个地点、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、8 周的研究,他们符合 DSM-IV-TR 结构临床访谈(SCID)的 BDII 标准。纳入标准包括稳定的药物治疗方案≥2 周,且轻躁狂伴混合症状(在两次连续就诊中,Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS]≥12 分,Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]≥15 分)。参与者被随机分配接受辅助喹硫平(n=30)或安慰剂(n=25)。
与安慰剂相比,辅助喹硫平在双相障碍整体严重程度临床总体印象量表(CGI-BP)评分(F(1)=10.12,p=.002)和 MADRS 评分(F(1)=6.93,p=.0138)方面有显著改善,但 YMRS 评分无显著差异(F(1)=3.68,p=.069)。喹硫平的副作用与先前临床试验中观察到的一致,镇静/嗜睡最常见,QTP 组发生率为 53.3%,PBO 组为 20.0%。
尽管 QTP 治疗 BDII 的总体和抑郁症状明显优于 PBO,但两组在减轻轻躁狂症状方面无显著差异。两组的轻躁狂症状在整个研究过程中均有所改善。