Ramirez E J, Hernandez E, Miyazawa K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 96859-5000.
J Reprod Med. 1990 Apr;35(4):359-61.
A review of 134 cervical conizations performed in a 36-month period showed that 18 were performed on patients with two or more cervical smears showing dysplasia but with essentially negative, satisfactory colposcopic evaluations, including normal colposcopically directed biopsies and endocervical curettings. A histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of various grades was established in 15 (83%) of the 18 conization specimens. Six (33%) of the 18 specimens harbored CIN 3. The histologic diagnosis of a more severe lesion than that indicated on cytology was rendered in five of the cases. Cervical conization should be performed when colposcopic evaluation of the cervix, vagina and vulva fails to identify the source of persistent CIN on Papanicolaou smears.
对在36个月内进行的134例宫颈锥切术的回顾显示,18例手术的患者有两次或更多次宫颈涂片显示发育异常,但阴道镜评估基本为阴性且结果令人满意,包括阴道镜引导下活检和宫颈管刮除术结果正常。18例锥切标本中有15例(83%)确诊为不同级别的宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)。18例标本中有6例(33%)存在CIN 3。5例病例的组织学诊断显示病变比细胞学检查提示的更严重。当对宫颈、阴道和外阴的阴道镜评估未能在巴氏涂片上识别出持续存在的CIN来源时,应进行宫颈锥切术。