• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统动力学建模评估南非生态恢复的经济可行性和风险权衡。

System dynamic modelling to assess economic viability and risk trade-offs for ecological restoration in South Africa.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2013 May 15;120:138-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.001
PMID:23524327
Abstract

Can markets assist by providing support for ecological restoration, and if so, under what conditions? The first step in addressing this question is to develop a consistent methodology for economic evaluation of ecological restoration projects. A risk analysis process was followed in which a system dynamics model was constructed for eight diverse case study sites where ecological restoration is currently being pursued. Restoration costs vary across each of these sites, as do the benefits associated with restored ecosystem functioning. The system dynamics model simulates the ecological, hydrological and economic benefits of ecological restoration and informs a portfolio mapping exercise where payoffs are matched against the likelihood of success of a project, as well as a number of other factors (such as project costs and risk measures). This is the first known application that couples ecological restoration with system dynamics and portfolio mapping. The results suggest an approach that is able to move beyond traditional indicators of project success, since the effect of discounting is virtually eliminated. We conclude that systems dynamic modelling with portfolio mapping can guide decisions on when markets for restoration activities may be feasible.

摘要

市场能否通过为生态恢复提供支持来发挥作用?如果可以,那么需要满足什么条件?要回答这个问题,首先需要制定出生态恢复项目经济评估的一致方法。我们遵循风险分析流程,为当前正在进行生态恢复的 8 个不同案例研究地点构建了系统动力学模型。这些地点的恢复成本各不相同,与恢复的生态系统功能相关的效益也各不相同。系统动力学模型模拟了生态、水文和经济效益的生态恢复,并提供了投资组合映射练习,根据项目的成功可能性、项目成本和风险措施等其他因素来匹配回报。这是首次将生态恢复与系统动力学和投资组合映射相结合的应用。结果表明,这种方法能够超越传统的项目成功指标,因为几乎消除了折现的影响。我们的结论是,结合投资组合映射的系统动力学建模可以为决策提供指导,即何时可以开展恢复活动的市场。

相似文献

1
System dynamic modelling to assess economic viability and risk trade-offs for ecological restoration in South Africa.系统动力学建模评估南非生态恢复的经济可行性和风险权衡。
J Environ Manage. 2013 May 15;120:138-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
2
Coordinating ecological restoration options analysis and risk assessment to improve environmental outcomes.协调生态恢复方案分析与风险评估以改善环境成果。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Apr;12(2):253-63. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1673. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
3
Spatial misallocation of ecological restoration and resulting economic costs in the red soil hilly region of China: a case study of the Zhuxi watershed.中国红壤丘陵区生态修复的空间错位及其经济代价:以竹溪流域为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 20;192(2):125. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-8076-x.
4
Integrated risk and recovery monitoring of ecosystem restorations on contaminated sites.污染场地生态修复的综合风险与恢复监测
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Apr;12(2):284-95. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1731. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.将生态风险转化为生态系统服务损失。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Oct;5(4):500-14. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2009-009.1.
6
Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria.量化生态系统服务权衡:以奥地利维也纳城市洪泛区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 30;111:159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
7
Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains.公众对河流修复的支持:一项关于荷兰洪泛区当地居民对河流管理和生态修复的支持及认知框架的混合方法研究
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2680-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
8
Modelling hydrological effects of wetland restoration: a differentiated view.湿地恢复的水文效应建模:一种差异化观点。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(3):433-41. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.884.
9
Negative off-site impacts of ecological restoration: understanding and addressing the conflict.生态修复的负面场外影响:理解并解决冲突
Conserv Biol. 2008 Oct;22(5):1118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01027.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
10
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

引用本文的文献

1
Investing in natural capital and national security: A comparative review of restoration projects in South Africa.投资自然资本与国家安全:南非修复项目的比较综述
Heliyon. 2019 May 24;5(5):e01765. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01765. eCollection 2019 May.
2
A multi-criterion approach for prioritizing areas in urban ecosystems for active restoration following invasive plant control.一种用于在入侵植物控制后对城市生态系统中的优先区域进行主动恢复的多准则方法。
Environ Manage. 2018 Dec;62(6):1150-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1103-9. Epub 2018 Sep 21.