• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

球坐标下面部不对称的正常范围:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究

Normal range of facial asymmetry in spherical coordinates: a CBCT study.

作者信息

Yoon Suk-Ja, Wang Rui-Feng, Na Hee Ja, Palomo Juan Martin

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Imaging Sci Dent. 2013 Mar;43(1):31-6. doi: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.31. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

DOI:10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.31
PMID:23525239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3604368/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to measure the bilateral differences of facial lines in spherical coordinates from faces within a normal range of asymmetry utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CBCT scans from 22 females with normal symmetric-looking faces (mean age 24 years and 8 months) were selected for the study. The average menton deviation was 1.01±0.66 mm. The spherical coordinates, length, and midsagittal and coronal inclination angles of the ramal and mandibular lines were calculated from CBCT. The bilateral differences in the facial lines were determined.

RESULTS

All of the study subjects had minimal bilateral differences of facial lines. The normal range of facial asymmetry of the ramal and mandibular lines was obtained in spherical coordinates.

CONCLUSION

The normal range of facial asymmetry in the spherical coordinate system in this study should be useful as a reference for diagnosing facial asymmetry.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量不对称性在正常范围内的面部在球坐标中的双侧差异。

材料与方法

本研究选取了22名面部外观对称正常的女性(平均年龄24岁8个月)的CBCT扫描图像。平均颏点偏差为1.01±0.66毫米。从CBCT计算升支和下颌骨线的球坐标、长度以及矢状面和冠状面倾斜角度。确定面部线条的双侧差异。

结果

所有研究对象的面部线条双侧差异均最小。在球坐标中获得了升支和下颌骨线面部不对称的正常范围。

结论

本研究中球坐标系下面部不对称的正常范围可作为诊断面部不对称的参考。

相似文献

1
Normal range of facial asymmetry in spherical coordinates: a CBCT study.球坐标下面部不对称的正常范围:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Imaging Sci Dent. 2013 Mar;43(1):31-6. doi: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.31. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
2
Application of spherical coordinate system to facial asymmetry analysis in mandibular prognathism patients.球坐标系在下颌前突患者面部不对称分析中的应用
Imaging Sci Dent. 2011 Sep;41(3):95-100. doi: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.3.95. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
3
Use of spherical coordinates to evaluate three-dimensional facial changes after orthognathic surgery.使用球坐标评估正颌外科手术后的三维面部变化。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar;44(1):15-20. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.15. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
4
Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Facial Asymmetry According to the Occlusal Cant and Menton Deviation.根据咬合斜度和颏点偏移对面部不对称的诊断及手术效果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;77(6):1261-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.028. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes.根据正中矢状面,骨骼Ⅲ类面部不对称患者锥束计算机断层扫描标志点位置的差异。
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Jul 25;53(4):219-231. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.015. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
The three-dimensional morphology of mandible and glenoid fossa as contributing factors to menton deviation in facial asymmetry-retrospective study.下颌骨和颞下颌关节窝的三维形态是导致面部不对称颏部偏斜的因素:回顾性研究。
Prog Orthod. 2020 Sep 22;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00335-3.
7
An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对单侧和双侧后牙反合青少年的髁突和升支垂直不对称性进行评估。
Aust Orthod J. 2014 May;30(1):11-8.
8
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估面部软硬组织不对称性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.
9
Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism.面部不对称和下颌后缩患者下颌形态的三维 CT 分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 May;153(5):685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.024.
10
[Evaluation of dental and craniofacial characteristics in patients with mild skeletal facial asymmetry].[轻度骨骼性面部不对称患者牙颌面特征评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2018 Aug;27(4):376-381.

引用本文的文献

1
Orthodontic program design based on aesthetic.基于美学的正畸方案设计。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 1;41(6):628-634. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023231.
2
A Novel Method to Combine Maxilla-Based Coordinate System and Mandibular Voxel-Based Superimposition with Cone-Bean Computed Tomography.一种基于锥形束计算机断层扫描将上颌骨坐标系与下颌骨体素叠加相结合的新方法。
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 4;11(17):5229. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175229.
3
Three-dimensional facial hard tissue symmetry in a healthy Caucasian population group: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis for the evaluation of facial asymmetry in normal occlusion individuals.用于评估正常咬合个体面部不对称的三维软组织分析
Korean J Orthod. 2012 Apr;42(2):56-63. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.56. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
2
Error analysis of terrestrial laser scanning data by means of spherical statistics and 3D graphs.基于球面统计学和 3D 图的地面激光扫描数据误差分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(11):10128-45. doi: 10.3390/s101110128. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
3
Application of spherical coordinate system to facial asymmetry analysis in mandibular prognathism patients.
健康白种人群的三维面部硬组织对称性:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6081-6092. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04126-w. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Fluctuating asymmetry of the normal facial skeleton.正常面部骨骼的波动不对称性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;47(4):534-540. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
The use of three-dimensional imaging to evaluate the effect of conventional orthodontic approach in treating a subject with facial asymmetry.使用三维成像技术评估传统正畸方法治疗面部不对称患者的效果。
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan-Jun;6(1):105-12. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.186138.
6
Facial asymmetry: a current review.面部不对称:当前综述
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):110-25. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.110-125.sar.
7
Use of spherical coordinates to evaluate three-dimensional facial changes after orthognathic surgery.使用球坐标评估正颌外科手术后的三维面部变化。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar;44(1):15-20. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.15. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
球坐标系在下颌前突患者面部不对称分析中的应用
Imaging Sci Dent. 2011 Sep;41(3):95-100. doi: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.3.95. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
4
Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients.影响下颌后缩和下颌前突患者颏部偏斜的颌面特征。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):988-93. doi: 10.2319/112210-681.1. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
5
A case report comparing 3-D evaluation in the diagnosis and treatment planning of hemimandibular hyperplasia with conventional radiography.一项比较三维评估与传统放射照相术在偏侧下颌骨增生诊断和治疗计划中的应用的病例报告。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;37(6):312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
6
Computer-aided morphological analysis for maxillo-facial diagnostic: a preliminary study.计算机辅助颌面诊断形态分析:初步研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Feb;63(2):218-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.09.031. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
7
Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.使用正畸容积再现程序构建的锥形束CT衍生三维图像的线性准确性和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.
8
Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography.影响Ⅲ类错牙合畸形及面部不对称女性患者颏点偏移的骨骼牙齿因素:基于计算机断层扫描的三维分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Nov;104(5):628-39. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
9
Cortical surface shape analysis based on spherical wavelets.基于球面小波的皮质表面形状分析
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Apr;26(4):582-97. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.892499.
10
Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry.用于面部不对称诊断的颌面三维图像分析
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Dec;130(6):779-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021.