Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Genève Genève, Switzerland ; Agalma Foundation Genève, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 22;4:135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00135. eCollection 2013.
Even as the neuro-psychoanalytic field has matured, from a naturalist point of view, the epistemological status of Freudian interpretations still remains problematic at a naturalist point of view. As a result of the resurgence of hermeneutics, the claim has been made that psychoanalysis is an extension of folk psychology. For these "extensionists," asking psychoanalysis to prove its interpretations would be as absurd as demanding the proofs of the scientific accuracy of folk psychology. I propose to show how Dennett's theory of the intentional stance allows us to defend an extensionist position while sparing us certain hermeneutic difficulties. In conclusion, I will consider how Shevrin et al. (1996) experiments could turn extensionist conceptual considerations into experimentally testable issues.
即使神经精神分析领域已经成熟，从自然主义的观点来看，弗洛伊德解释的认识论地位在自然主义的观点下仍然存在问题。由于解释学的复兴，有人声称精神分析是民间心理学的延伸。对于这些“延伸主义者”来说，要求精神分析证明其解释就像要求证明民间心理学的科学准确性一样荒谬。我提议展示丹尼特的意向立场理论如何允许我们在避免某些解释学困难的同时，捍卫延伸主义立场。最后，我将考虑谢夫林等人（1996 年）的实验如何将延伸主义的概念考虑转化为可实验检验的问题。
