Selmer R, Foss O P, Lund-Larsen P G
National Health Screening Service, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990 May;50(3):261-71. doi: 10.3109/00365519009091577.
Measurements of total cholesterol in the field by means of the Reflotron dry-chemistry system (capillary blood) were compared to total cholesterol obtained by a standardized conventional wet-chemistry method in a clinico-chemical laboratory (serum). A total of 1200 people participated in the study. Two identical Reflotron machines were used. In the first period of the study an excellent agreement was found between Reflotron measurements of a reference serum provided by the manufacturer (mean, 4.99 mmol/l; CV, 1.8%) and the stated value (4.97 mmol/l). In the rest of the study higher values and greater variation were found with the Reflotron (mean, 5.32 mmol/l; CV 5.2%). Clearly the Reflotron measurements in the latter period of study were not reliable. In the period with stable instruments most of the values obtained at the two Reflotron machines differed from each other by less than 10%, with a mean difference of 0.08 mmol/l. Reflotron (both machines) and wet-chemistry measurements agreed well for the first 500 participants in the study (mean difference, Reflotron-wet-chemistry, -0.008 mmol/l; 95% confidence interval, -0.035 to 0.019 mmol/l; correlation, 0.967). In this period most Reflotron values differed from wet-chemistry values by less than 9% below to 9% above. With the next 200 participants the Reflotron gave on average slightly higher values than wet-chemistry measurements. The coefficients of variation for measurement variation were higher for Reflotron that for wet-chemistry even in the period with stable instruments. In all parts of the study period a lower HDL-cholesterol level was associated with larger differences between total cholesterol determined by Reflotron and wet-chemistry.
通过Reflotron干化学系统(毛细血管血)在现场测量总胆固醇,并与临床化学实验室(血清)采用标准化传统湿化学方法测得的总胆固醇进行比较。共有1200人参与了该研究。使用了两台相同的Reflotron仪器。在研究的第一阶段,发现制造商提供的参考血清的Reflotron测量值(均值为4.99 mmol/L;变异系数为1.8%)与规定值(4.97 mmol/L)之间具有极好的一致性。在研究的其余阶段,Reflotron测得的值更高且变异更大(均值为5.32 mmol/L;变异系数为5.2%)。显然,研究后期Reflotron的测量结果不可靠。在仪器稳定的时期,两台Reflotron仪器测得的大多数值彼此相差不到10%,平均差值为0.08 mmol/L。对于研究中的前500名参与者,Reflotron(两台仪器)和湿化学测量结果吻合良好(Reflotron - 湿化学的平均差值为 -0.008 mmol/L;95%置信区间为 -0.035至0.019 mmol/L;相关性为0.967)。在此期间,大多数Reflotron值与湿化学值的差异在低于9%至高于9%之间。对于接下来的200名参与者,Reflotron测得的平均值略高于湿化学测量值。即使在仪器稳定的时期,Reflotron测量变异的变异系数也高于湿化学测量。在研究期间的所有阶段,较低的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与Reflotron和湿化学法测定的总胆固醇之间的较大差异相关。