• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CRISPR-Cas 系统优先靶向 MOBF 接合质粒的先导区域。

CRISPR-Cas systems preferentially target the leading regions of MOBF conjugative plasmids.

机构信息

Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

RNA Biol. 2013 May;10(5):749-61. doi: 10.4161/rna.24202. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

DOI:10.4161/rna.24202
PMID:23535265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3737333/
Abstract

Most prokaryotes contain CRISPR-Cas immune systems that provide protection against mobile genetic elements. We have focused on the ability of CRISPR-Cas to block plasmid conjugation, and analyzed the position of target sequences (protospacers) on conjugative plasmids. The analysis reveals that protospacers are non-uniformly distributed over plasmid regions in a pattern that is determined by the plasmid's mobilization type (MOB). While MOBP plasmids are most frequently targeted in the region entering the recipient cell last (lagging region), MOBF plasmids are mostly targeted in the region entering the recipient cell first (leading region). To explain this protospacer distribution bias, we propose two mutually non-exclusive hypotheses: (1) spacers are acquired more frequently from either the leading or lagging region depending on the MOB type (2) CRISPR-interference is more efficient when spacers target these preferred regions. To test the latter hypothesis, we analyzed Type I-E CRISPR-interference against MOBF prototype plasmid F in Escherichia coli. Our results show that plasmid conjugation is effectively inhibited, but the level of immunity is not affected by targeting the plasmid in the leading or lagging region. Moreover, CRISPR-immunity levels do not depend on whether the incoming single-stranded plasmid DNA, or the DNA strand synthesized in the recipient is targeted. Our findings indicate that single-stranded DNA may not be a target for Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems, and suggest that the protospacer distribution bias might be due to spacer acquisition preferences.

摘要

大多数原核生物都含有 CRISPR-Cas 免疫系统,可提供针对移动遗传元件的保护。我们专注于 CRISPR-Cas 阻断质粒接合的能力,并分析了目标序列(原间隔区)在可接合质粒上的位置。分析表明,原间隔区在质粒区域中的分布不均匀,呈由质粒的移动类型(MOB)决定的模式。虽然 MOBP 质粒最常靶向进入受体细胞的最后一个区域(滞后区),但 MOBF 质粒主要靶向进入受体细胞的第一个区域(先导区)。为了解释这种原间隔区分布的偏向性,我们提出了两个相互排斥的假说:(1)根据 MOB 类型,间隔区从先导区或滞后区获得的频率更高;(2)当间隔区靶向这些首选区域时,CRISPR 干扰的效率更高。为了检验后一种假说,我们分析了 I-E 型 CRISPR 对大肠杆菌中 MOBF 原型质粒 F 的干扰。结果表明,质粒接合被有效抑制,但靶向先导区或滞后区对免疫水平没有影响。此外,CRISPR 免疫水平不受靶向进入的单链质粒 DNA 或受体中合成的 DNA 链的影响。我们的发现表明,单链 DNA 可能不是 I-E 型 CRISPR-Cas 系统的靶标,并提示原间隔区分布偏向可能是由于间隔区获得的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/d2baafc3c3d0/rna-10-749-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/dd8d1511d4b9/rna-10-749-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/6d205c3ed6c9/rna-10-749-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/3b183a589906/rna-10-749-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/d2baafc3c3d0/rna-10-749-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/dd8d1511d4b9/rna-10-749-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/6d205c3ed6c9/rna-10-749-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/3b183a589906/rna-10-749-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beda/3737333/d2baafc3c3d0/rna-10-749-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
CRISPR-Cas systems preferentially target the leading regions of MOBF conjugative plasmids.CRISPR-Cas 系统优先靶向 MOBF 接合质粒的先导区域。
RNA Biol. 2013 May;10(5):749-61. doi: 10.4161/rna.24202. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
2
CRISPR-spacer integration reporter plasmids reveal distinct genuine acquisition specificities among CRISPR-Cas I-E variants of Escherichia coli.CRISPR 间隔区整合报告质粒揭示了大肠杆菌 CRISPR-Cas I-E 变体之间独特的真实获取特异性。
RNA Biol. 2013 May;10(5):792-802. doi: 10.4161/rna.24023. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Degenerate target sites mediate rapid primed CRISPR adaptation.退化的靶标位点介导快速的引物 CRISPR 适应性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):E1629-38. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400071111. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
4
Priming in the Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system triggers strand-independent spacer acquisition, bi-directionally from the primed protospacer.I-F型CRISPR-Cas系统中的引发作用会触发与链无关的间隔序列获取,从引发的原间隔序列双向进行。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(13):8516-26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku527. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
5
Identification of Spacer and Protospacer Sequence Requirements in the Vibrio cholerae Type I-E CRISPR/Cas System.鉴定霍乱弧菌 I-E 型 CRISPR/Cas 系统中的间隔区和原间隔区序列要求。
mSphere. 2020 Nov 18;5(6):e00813-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00813-20.
6
Protospacer-Adjacent Motif Specificity during Clostridioides difficile Type I-B CRISPR-Cas Interference and Adaptation.艰难梭菌 I-B 型 CRISPR-Cas 干扰和适应过程中的间隔区邻近基序特异性。
mBio. 2021 Aug 31;12(4):e0213621. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02136-21. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
The CRISPR Spacer Space Is Dominated by Sequences from Species-Specific Mobilomes.CRISPR 间隔区主要由种间特异性转座子元件序列组成。
mBio. 2017 Sep 19;8(5):e01397-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01397-17.
8
High-throughput analysis of type I-E CRISPR/Cas spacer acquisition in E. coli.大肠杆菌中 I-E 型 CRISPR/Cas 间隔区获取的高通量分析。
RNA Biol. 2013 May;10(5):716-25. doi: 10.4161/rna.24325. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
9
Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity.不同靶序列对III型CRISPR-Cas免疫的影响
J Bacteriol. 2016 Jan 11;198(6):941-50. doi: 10.1128/JB.00897-15.
10
Cas1 and Cas2 From the Type II-C CRISPR-Cas System of Are Required for Spacer Acquisition.Cas1 和 Cas2 来自 的 II-C 型 CRISPR-Cas 系统,对于间隔区获取是必需的。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Jun 12;8:195. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00195. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The extended mobility of plasmids.质粒的扩展迁移性
Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Jul 19;53(14). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf652.
2
Precise virulence inactivation using a CRISPR-associated transposase for combating Enterobacteriaceae gut pathogens.使用CRISPR相关转座酶精确灭活毒力以对抗肠道肠杆菌科病原体。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01453-1.
3
Diverse anti-defence systems are encoded in the leading region of plasmids.质粒的先导区编码多种防御系统。

本文引用的文献

1
Diversity of CRISPR loci in Escherichia coli.大肠杆菌中CRISPR基因座的多样性。
Microbiology (Reading). 2010 May;156(5):1351-1361. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.036046-0.
2
In vitro reconstitution of Cascade-mediated CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus.在嗜热链球菌中体外重建级联介导的 CRISPR 免疫。
EMBO J. 2013 Feb 6;32(3):385-94. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.352. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
3
The CRISPRs, they are a-changin': how prokaryotes generate adaptive immunity.CRISPR 系统,正在变化:原核生物如何产生获得性免疫。
Nature. 2024 Nov;635(8037):186-192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07994-w. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Assessing the Role of Bacterial Innate and Adaptive Immunity as Barriers to Conjugative Plasmids.评估细菌固有和适应性免疫作为共轭质粒屏障的作用。
Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Oct 4;41(10). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae207.
5
Elucidating the biotechnological potential of the genera Parageobacillus and Saccharococcus through comparative genomic and pan-genome analysis.通过比较基因组学和泛基因组分析阐明 Parageobacillus 和 Saccharococcus 属的生物技术潜力。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Jul 25;25(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10635-1.
6
Conjugation's Toolkit: the Roles of Nonstructural Proteins in Bacterial Sex.连接工具包:非结构蛋白在细菌性别中的作用。
J Bacteriol. 2023 Mar 21;205(3):e0043822. doi: 10.1128/jb.00438-22. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Real-time visualisation of the intracellular dynamics of conjugative plasmid transfer.实时可视化共轭质粒转移的细胞内动力学。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 18;14(1):294. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35978-3.
8
CRISPR-Cas systems are widespread accessory elements across bacterial and archaeal plasmids.CRISPR-Cas 系统广泛存在于细菌和古菌质粒的附属元件中。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 May 6;50(8):4315-4328. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab859.
9
Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology.深入研究 CRISPR 生物学鲜为人知的方面。
Int Microbiol. 2021 Nov;24(4):473-498. doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00208-7. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Efficient inter-species conjugative transfer of a CRISPR nuclease for targeted bacterial killing.高效的种间共轭转移 CRISPR 核酸酶用于靶向细菌杀伤。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4544. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12448-3.
Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:311-39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155447.
4
Memory of viral infections by CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems: acquisition of new information.CRISPR-Cas 适应性免疫系统对病毒感染的记忆:获取新信息。
Virology. 2012 Dec 20;434(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
5
Cascade-mediated binding and bending of negatively supercoiled DNA.级联介导的负超螺旋 DNA 的结合和弯曲。
RNA Biol. 2012 Sep;9(9):1134-8. doi: 10.4161/rna.21410. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
6
The highly dynamic CRISPR1 system of Streptococcus agalactiae controls the diversity of its mobilome.化脓性链球菌高度动态的 CRISPR1 系统控制着其可移动元件的多样性。
Mol Microbiol. 2012 Sep;85(6):1057-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08172.x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
7
Selective and hyperactive uptake of foreign DNA by adaptive immune systems of an archaeon via two distinct mechanisms.古菌适应性免疫系统通过两种不同机制选择性和过度摄取外源 DNA。
Mol Microbiol. 2012 Sep;85(6):1044-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08171.x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
8
The rise and fall of CRISPRs--dynamics of spacer acquisition and loss.CRISPR 的兴衰——间隔区获取和丢失的动态。
Mol Microbiol. 2012 Sep;85(6):1021-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08170.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system.先前感染的分子记忆激活了 CRISPR/Cas 适应性细菌免疫系统。
Nat Commun. 2012 Jul 10;3:945. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1937.
10
Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophage PA1Ø requires type IV pili for infection and shows broad bactericidal and biofilm removal activities.铜绿假单胞菌噬菌体 PA1Ø 需要 IV 型菌毛才能感染,并表现出广泛的杀菌和生物膜清除活性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;78(17):6380-5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00648-12. Epub 2012 Jun 29.