• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴布亚新几内亚的大流行性流感:与发达国家大流行传播的模型研究比较。

Pandemic influenza in Papua New Guinea: a modelling study comparison with pandemic spread in a developed country.

机构信息

School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 26;3(3):e002518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002518.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002518
PMID:23535701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3612822/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The possible occurrence of a highly pathogenic influenza strain is of concern to health authorities worldwide. It is known that during past influenza pandemics developing countries have experienced considerably higher death rates compared with developed countries. Furthermore, many developing countries lack appropriate pandemic preparedness plans. Mathematical modelling studies to guide the development of such plans are largely focused on predicting pandemic influenza spread in developed nations. However, intervention strategies shown by modelling studies to be highly effective for developed countries give limited guidance as to the impact which an influenza pandemic may have on low-income countries given different demographics and resource constraints. To address this, an individual-based model of a Papua New Guinean (PNG) community was created and used to simulate the spread of a novel influenza strain. The results were compared with those obtained from a comparable Australian model.

DESIGN

A modelling study.

SETTING

The towns of Madang in PNG (population ∼35 000) and Albany (population ∼30 000) in Australia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Daily and cumulative illness attack rates in both models following introduction of a novel influenza strain into a naive population, for an unmitigated scenario and two social distancing intervention scenarios.

RESULTS

The unmitigated scenario indicated an approximately 50% higher attack rate in PNG compared with the Australian model. The two social distancing-based interventions strategies were 60-70% less effective in a PNG setting compared with an Australian setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further evidence that an influenza pandemic occurring in a low-income country such as PNG may have a greater impact than one occurring in a developed country, and that PNG-feasible interventions may be substantially less effective. The larger average household size in PNG, the larger proportion of the population under 18 and greater community-wide contact all contribute to this feature.

摘要

目的

高致病性流感毒株的出现引起了世界卫生当局的关注。众所周知,在过去的流感大流行中,发展中国家的死亡率远远高于发达国家。此外,许多发展中国家缺乏适当的大流行准备计划。指导制定这些计划的数学建模研究主要集中在预测发达国家的大流行性流感传播。然而,建模研究表明,对于发达国家而言,干预策略非常有效,但对于低收入国家而言,由于人口统计学和资源限制的不同,大流行性流感可能产生的影响的指导有限。为了解决这个问题,创建了一个基于个人的巴布亚新几内亚(PNG)社区模型,并用于模拟新型流感株的传播。将结果与从可比的澳大利亚模型获得的结果进行了比较。

设计

建模研究。

设置

巴布亚新几内亚的马当镇(人口约 35000 人)和澳大利亚的奥尔巴尼镇(人口约 30000 人)。

结果衡量

在未缓解的情况下以及两种社会隔离干预方案下,两种模型中引入新流感株后,人群的每日和累积发病率。

结果

在未缓解的情况下,PNG 的发病率比澳大利亚模型高约 50%。在 PNG 环境中,两种基于社会隔离的干预策略的有效性比澳大利亚环境低 60-70%。

结论

这项研究进一步证明,在像 PNG 这样的低收入国家发生的流感大流行可能比在发达国家发生的流感大流行造成更大的影响,并且在 PNG 可行的干预措施可能效果要差得多。PNG 较大的平均家庭规模,18 岁以下人口比例较大以及更广泛的社区接触都促成了这一特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c640/3612822/91bfc76f03bf/bmjopen2012002518f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c640/3612822/6432156905b9/bmjopen2012002518f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c640/3612822/91bfc76f03bf/bmjopen2012002518f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c640/3612822/6432156905b9/bmjopen2012002518f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c640/3612822/91bfc76f03bf/bmjopen2012002518f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Pandemic influenza in Papua New Guinea: a modelling study comparison with pandemic spread in a developed country.巴布亚新几内亚的大流行性流感:与发达国家大流行传播的模型研究比较。
BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 26;3(3):e002518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002518.
2
Analysis of the effectiveness of interventions used during the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic.分析 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间使用的干预措施的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 29;10:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-168.
3
Perceptions about the value and cost of children: Australian and Papua New Guinean high school youth.对儿童价值和成本的认知:澳大利亚和巴布亚新几内亚的高中生
J Biosoc Sci. 1984 Jan;16(1):35-44. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000014772.
4
Vaccination strategies for future influenza pandemics: a severity-based cost effectiveness analysis.未来流感大流行的疫苗接种策略:基于严重程度的成本效益分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Feb 11;13:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-81.
5
Simulation suggests that rapid activation of social distancing can arrest epidemic development due to a novel strain of influenza.模拟结果表明,迅速实施社交距离措施能够遏制新型流感毒株引发的疫情发展。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 29;9:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-117.
6
A small community model for the transmission of infectious diseases: comparison of school closure as an intervention in individual-based models of an influenza pandemic.一种传染病传播的小型社区模型:将学校关闭作为流感大流行个体模型干预措施的比较。
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004005. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
7
Barriers and facilitators to effective tuberculosis infection control practices in Madang Province, PNG - a qualitative study.巴布亚新几内亚马当省有效结核病感染控制措施的障碍与促进因素——一项定性研究
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Aug;18(3):4401. doi: 10.22605/RRH4401. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Back to the future: lethal respiratory pandemics in New Guinea.回到未来:新几内亚致命呼吸道大流行。
Intern Med J. 2022 Jan;52(1):146-149. doi: 10.1111/imj.15651.
9
Likely effectiveness of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating influenza virus transmission in Mongolia.蒙古针对缓解流感病毒传播的药物和非药物干预措施的可能效果。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Apr 1;90(4):264-71. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.093419.
10
Can informal social distancing interventions minimize demand for antiviral treatment during a severe pandemic?在严重疫情期间,非正式社交距离干预措施能否将对抗病毒治疗的需求降至最低?
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 18;13:669. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-669.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational decision-support tools for urban design to improve resilience against COVID-19 and other infectious diseases: A systematic review.用于城市设计以提高对COVID-19和其他传染病抵御能力的计算决策支持工具:一项系统综述。
Prog Plann. 2023 Feb;168:100657. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2022.100657. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Effectiveness of social distancing interventions in containing COVID-19 incidence: International evidence using Kalman filter.社交距离干预措施在控制新冠病毒疾病发病率方面的有效性:运用卡尔曼滤波器的国际证据
Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;44:101091. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101091. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
"Infodemic" COVID 19: More Pandemic than the Virus.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pandemic influenza preparedness: what's missing?大流行性流感防范的成本效益分析:缺失了什么?
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Dec 1;90(12):940-1. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.109025. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
2
Age-specific and sex-specific mortality in 187 countries, 1970-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1970-2010 年 187 个国家按年龄和性别划分的死亡率:全球疾病负担研究 2010 年的系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2071-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61719-X.
3
Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study.
“信息疫情”下的新冠疫情:比病毒更具传播性
Indian J Nephrol. 2020 May-Jun;30(3):188-191. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_216_20. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
COVID-19 and tuberculosis: A mathematical model based forecasting in Delhi, India.新型冠状病毒肺炎与结核病:基于数学模型对印度德里的预测
Indian J Tuberc. 2020 Apr;67(2):177-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
Effectiveness of workplace social distancing measures in reducing influenza transmission: a systematic review.工作场所社交距离措施在减少流感传播中的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5446-1.
6
The cost-effectiveness of trivalent and quadrivalent influenza vaccination in communities in South Africa, Vietnam and Australia.三价和四价流感疫苗在南非、越南和澳大利亚社区中的成本效益。
Vaccine. 2018 Feb 8;36(7):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.073. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Lessons from a decade of individual-based models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2006-2015).基于个体的传染病传播模型十年经验教训:一项系统综述(2006 - 2015年)
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2699-8.
8
Spatial Effects on the Multiplicity of Plasmodium falciparum Infections.恶性疟原虫感染多样性的空间效应
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0164054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164054. eCollection 2016.
9
A spatial simulation model for dengue virus infection in urban areas.城市地区登革热病毒感染的空间模拟模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 20;14:447. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-447.
估算与 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感病毒流行的头 12 个月相关的全球死亡人数:一项建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;12(9):687-95. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70121-4. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
4
Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets.雪貂之间甲型流感病毒 H5N1 的空气传播。
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1534-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1213362.
5
Improving influenza surveillance in sub-Saharan Africa.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区的流感监测。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Apr 1;90(4):301-5. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.098244.
6
Influenza at the beginning of the 21st century.21世纪初的流感。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Apr 1;90(4):247-247A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.104653.
7
The WHO research agenda for influenza: two years later.世界卫生组织流感研究议程:两年之后。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Apr 1;90(4):246. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.090175.
8
Cost-effective strategies for mitigating a future influenza pandemic with H1N1 2009 characteristics.具有 H1N1 2009 特征的未来流感大流行的成本效益缓解策略。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022087. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
9
Pandemic influenza in Africa, lessons learned from 1968: a systematic review of the literature.非洲的大流行性流感,从 1968 年吸取的教训:文献系统回顾。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012 Jan;6(1):11-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00257.x. Epub 2011 May 3.
10
Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic.制定未来流感大流行期间学校关闭干预措施的指南。
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 27;10:221. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-221.