• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交距离干预措施在控制新冠病毒疾病发病率方面的有效性:运用卡尔曼滤波器的国际证据

Effectiveness of social distancing interventions in containing COVID-19 incidence: International evidence using Kalman filter.

作者信息

Prakash Navendu, Srivastava Bhavya, Singh Shveta, Sharma Seema, Jain Sonali

机构信息

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Vishwakarma Bhawan, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India.

出版信息

Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;44:101091. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101091. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101091
PMID:34894622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8638209/
Abstract

The epidemiological literature has widely documented the importance of social distancing interventions in containing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the epidemiological measure of virus reproduction, R, provides a myopic view of containment, especially when the absolute number of cases is still high. The paper investigates cross-country variations concerning the impact of social distancing interventions on COVID-19 incidence by employing a statistical measure of containment, which models the daily number of cases as a structural time-series, state-space vector. Countries that adopt strict lockdown policies and provide economic support in the form of income augmentations and debt relief improve the response towards the pandemic. Countries like China and South Korea have been most influential in containing the spread of infections. European nations of France, Italy, Spain and the UK are witnessing a second wave of the virus, indicating that re-opening the European economy perhaps has instigated an exponential spread.

摘要

流行病学文献广泛记录了社会 distancing 干预措施在遏制 COVID-19 大流行传播方面的重要性。然而,病毒繁殖数 R 这一流行病学指标对遏制情况的看法较为短视,尤其是当病例绝对数量仍然很高时。本文通过采用一种遏制统计指标来研究各国在社会 distancing 干预措施对 COVID-19 发病率影响方面的差异,该指标将每日病例数建模为一个结构时间序列、状态空间向量。采取严格封锁政策并以增加收入和债务减免形式提供经济支持的国家,对疫情的应对效果更好。中国和韩国等国家在遏制感染传播方面最具影响力。法国、意大利、西班牙和英国等欧洲国家正经历病毒的第二波传播,这表明重新开放欧洲经济可能引发了指数级传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/b24e5e174547/gr5a_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/f5b22d1a33d0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/b67dccae1c49/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/f0c2fce63d43/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/56859d63c7b4/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/b24e5e174547/gr5a_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/f5b22d1a33d0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/b67dccae1c49/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/f0c2fce63d43/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/56859d63c7b4/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e36/8638209/b24e5e174547/gr5a_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of social distancing interventions in containing COVID-19 incidence: International evidence using Kalman filter.社交距离干预措施在控制新冠病毒疾病发病率方面的有效性:运用卡尔曼滤波器的国际证据
Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;44:101091. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101091. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.意大利的 COVID-19 大流行第一波:数据和证据。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
3
Quantifying the Effects of Social Distancing on the Spread of COVID-19.量化社交隔离对 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115566.
4
Effect of the social distancing measures on the spread of COVID-19 in 10 highly infected countries.社交距离措施对 10 个高感染国家 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 10;742:140430. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140430. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
Estimating The Possible Role Of Testing Capacity And Social Distancing In Predicting The Growth Rate Of Daily Covid-19 Cases.估计检测能力和社交距离在预测每日新冠病例增长率方面的可能作用。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(Suppl 1)(4):S686-S690.
6
Mapping social distancing measures to the reproduction number for COVID-19.将社交隔离措施映射到 COVID-19 的繁殖数。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200276. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0276. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
Mathematical Modeling Predicts That Strict Social Distancing Measures Would Be Needed to Shorten the Duration of Waves of COVID-19 Infections in Vietnam.数学模型预测,越南需要采取严格的社会隔离措施,才能缩短 COVID-19 感染波的持续时间。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;8:559693. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.559693. eCollection 2020.
8
Elementary effects analysis of factors controlling COVID-19 infections in computational simulation reveals the importance of social distancing and mask usage.计算模拟中控制 COVID-19 感染因素的基本效应分析揭示了社交距离和口罩使用的重要性。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jul;134:104369. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104369. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
9
The benefits and costs of social distancing in high- and low-income countries.高收入国家和低收入国家中保持社交距离的益处与成本。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 1;115(7):807-819. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa140.
10
[What is the effect of social distancing on the course of COVID-19 epidemic?].社交距离对新冠疫情进程有何影响?
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2021 Feb 24;49(289):71-79.

引用本文的文献

1
From node to network: weaving a global perspective on efficacy and costs of non-pharmaceutical interventions.从节点到网络:构建关于非药物干预措施的效果和成本的全球视角。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87566-8.
2
Serological survey in a university community after the fourth wave of COVID-19 in Senegal.塞内加尔第四波 COVID-19 后大学社区的血清学调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0298509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298509. eCollection 2024.
3
Easing anxiety symptoms through leisure activities during social isolation: Findings from nationally representative samples.

本文引用的文献

1
Narrative Economics, Public Policy and Mental Health.叙事经济学、公共政策与心理健康
Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(1):43-70. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10109-0. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
2
Non-pharmaceutical interventions and mortality in U.S. cities during the great influenza pandemic, 1918-1919.1918 - 1919年大流感疫情期间美国城市的非药物干预措施与死亡率
Res Econ. 2022 Jun;76(2):93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
3
Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China.中国的人员流动限制与新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)的传播
通过社交隔离期间的休闲活动缓解焦虑症状:来自全国代表性样本的发现。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0303585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303585. eCollection 2024.
4
L. Extracts and Other Therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 in Central Eurasia: Available but Overlooked.中亚地区针对 SARS-CoV-2 的提取物和其他疗法:已有但被忽视。
Molecules. 2023 Aug 19;28(16):6142. doi: 10.3390/molecules28166142.
5
The illusion of personal health decisions for infectious disease management: disease spread in social contact networks.传染病管理中个人健康决策的错觉:社交网络中的疾病传播
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Mar 29;10(3):221122. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221122. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Do more stringent policies reduce daily COVID-19 case counts? Evidence from Canadian provinces.更严格的政策会降低新冠肺炎每日病例数吗?来自加拿大各省的证据。
Econ Anal Policy. 2023 Jun;78:225-242. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
7
Impact of pre-pandemic travel mobility patterns on the spatial diffusion of COVID-19 in South Korea.疫情前出行流动模式对韩国新冠病毒病空间传播的影响
J Transp Health. 2022 Sep;26:101479. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101479. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104272. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
4
The psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic severity.新冠大流行严重程度带来的心理负担。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100979. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2021.100979. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Disparities in COVID-19 mortality by county racial composition and the role of spring social distancing measures.按县种族构成划分的 COVID-19 死亡率差异及春季社会隔离措施的作用。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100953. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100953. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
COVID-19: The impact of social distancing policies, cross-country analysis.新冠疫情:社交距离政策的影响,跨国分析
Econ Disaster Clim Chang. 2021;5(1):135-159. doi: 10.1007/s41885-020-00076-x. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Effect of Social Distancing on COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Iran Since February 20 to May 13, 2020: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.2020年2月20日至5月13日社交距离措施对伊朗新冠肺炎发病率和死亡率的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Sep 23;13:1695-1700. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S265079. eCollection 2020.
8
Do Quarantine Experiences and Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Affect the Distribution of Mental Health in China? A Quantile Regression Analysis.隔离经历及对新冠疫情的态度是否影响中国的心理健康分布?一项分位数回归分析。
Appl Res Qual Life. 2021;16(5):1925-1942. doi: 10.1007/s11482-020-09851-0. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Estimating the impact of physical distancing measures in containing COVID-19: an empirical analysis.估算物理隔离措施在控制 COVID-19 中的影响:一项实证分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic.大规模防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):262-267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.