RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Jun;45(3):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9461-7.
There are almost no data on whether the different channels through which pro-smoking media appear (i.e., point-of-sale advertising, movie smoking) differently influence smoking.
This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine whether differences in smoking risk were observed for exposures to different pro-smoking media channels.
College students (n = 134) carried smartphones for 21 days, recording their exposures to pro-smoking media and the media channels for that exposure and responding to three randomly issued control prompts per day. Participants answered questions about their future smoking risk after each pro-smoking media exposure and random prompt.
Participants had elevated future smoking risk following exposure to pro-smoking media at point of sale (p < 0.001); smoking risk at times of exposure to smoking in movies did not differ from risk measured during control prompts (p = 0.78).
There is merit to examining the relative contribution of different pro-smoking media channels to smoking behavior.
几乎没有数据表明,吸烟宣传出现在不同渠道(例如,销售点广告、电影中的吸烟镜头)是否会对吸烟行为产生不同影响。
本研究使用生态瞬时评估来检查接触不同的吸烟宣传渠道是否会观察到吸烟风险的差异。
大学生(n=134)携带智能手机 21 天,记录他们接触吸烟宣传和接触的媒体渠道,并每天随机发出三个控制提示。参与者在每次接触吸烟宣传和随机提示后回答有关他们未来吸烟风险的问题。
参与者在销售点接触吸烟宣传后未来吸烟风险升高(p<0.001);在观看电影中吸烟镜头时的吸烟风险与控制提示期间测量的风险没有差异(p=0.78)。
检查不同的吸烟宣传渠道对吸烟行为的相对贡献是有价值的。