Friends Research Institute, Inc., 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2013 Jul;17(6):2022-30. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0456-6.
Many probationers and parolees do not receive HIV testing despite being at increased risk for obtaining and transmitting HIV. A two-group randomized controlled trial was conducted between April, 2011 and May, 2012 at probation/parole offices in Baltimore, Maryland and Providence/Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Male and female probationers/parolees were interviewed (n = 1,263) and then offered HIV testing based on random assignment to one of two conditions: (1) On-site rapid HIV testing conducted at the probation/parole office; or (2) Referral for rapid HIV testing off site at a community HIV testing clinic. Outcomes were: (1) undergoing HIV testing; and (2) receipt of HIV testing results. Participants were significantly more likely to be tested on-site at a probation/parole office versus off-site at a HIV testing clinic (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of receiving HIV testing results. Findings indicate that probationers/parolees are willing to be tested on-site and, independent of testing location, are equally willing to receive their results. Implications for expanding rapid HIV testing to more criminal justice related locations and populations are discussed.
许多缓刑犯和假释犯尽管感染和传播艾滋病毒的风险增加,但并未接受艾滋病毒检测。2011 年 4 月至 2012 年 5 月,在马里兰州巴尔的摩和罗得岛普罗维登斯/波塔基特的缓刑/假释办公室进行了一项两组成组随机对照试验。对男性和女性缓刑犯/假释犯进行了访谈(n=1263),然后根据随机分配到以下两种条件之一接受艾滋病毒检测:(1)在缓刑/假释办公室进行现场快速艾滋病毒检测;或(2)在社区艾滋病毒检测诊所进行场外快速艾滋病毒检测转诊。结果是:(1)接受艾滋病毒检测;(2)收到艾滋病毒检测结果。与在社区艾滋病毒检测诊所进行场外检测相比,参与者在缓刑/假释办公室进行现场检测的可能性显著更高(p<0.001)。两组在接受艾滋病毒检测结果方面没有差异。研究结果表明,缓刑犯/假释犯愿意接受现场检测,并且无论检测地点如何,他们同样愿意接收检测结果。讨论了将快速艾滋病毒检测扩展到更多与刑事司法相关的地点和人群的意义。