Suppr超能文献

消除半衰期作为评估化学物质在水生和陆地食物链中生物累积潜力的指标。

Elimination half-life as a metric for the bioaccumulation potential of chemicals in aquatic and terrestrial food chains.

机构信息

Department of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Jul;32(7):1663-71. doi: 10.1002/etc.2229. Epub 2013 May 23.

Abstract

The assessment of chemicals as bioaccumulative in the regulatory process makes use of the bioconcentration factor as a metric. However, this metric does not account for the dietary uptake route and therefore cannot be applied to terrestrial food chains. In recent years, the biomagnification factor (BMF) and the trophic magnification factor (TMF) have been suggested as standard metrics for bioaccumulation. For regulatory purposes, though, the BMF and the TMF also suffer from a number of shortcomings. They are not applicable to assess uptake routes other than the diet (e.g., dermal uptake, as is important for personal care products). When measured in the field, they depend largely on biological and ecological factors and less so on the chemical's properties, and they are difficult to normalize and standardize. In the present study, the authors suggest the elimination half-life (EL0.5 ) of a chemical as an alternative metric for bioaccumulation. The EL0.5 is equivalent to the depuration rate constant (k2 ) that is measured in various bioaccumulation and bioconcentration tests. This metric can be applied to air- and water-breathing animals, and it is valuable for all uptake routes. It has a number of practical advantages over the BMF and the TMF. In combination with a standard uptake scenario, the EL0.5 can also be linked directly to a BMF threshold of unity. Thus, the EL0.5 as a bioaccumulation metric overcomes the shortcomings of the BMF and the TMF while still conserving the advantages of the latter metrics.

摘要

在监管过程中,评估化学品的生物蓄积性时会使用生物浓缩因子作为指标。然而,这个指标并未考虑到饮食摄入途径,因此不能应用于陆地食物链。近年来,生物放大因子(BMF)和营养级放大因子(TMF)已被提议作为生物蓄积的标准指标。然而,对于监管目的而言,BMF 和 TMF 也存在一些缺点。它们不适用于评估除饮食以外的摄入途径(例如,皮肤摄入,这对于个人护理产品很重要)。当在野外测量时,它们在很大程度上取决于生物和生态因素,而较少取决于化学物质的性质,并且难以标准化。在本研究中,作者建议将化学物质的消除半衰期(EL0.5)作为生物蓄积的替代指标。EL0.5 相当于在各种生物蓄积和生物浓缩测试中测量的消除速率常数(k2)。该指标可应用于空气呼吸和水呼吸动物,并且对所有摄入途径都有价值。它在许多实际方面优于 BMF 和 TMF。与标准摄取情况结合使用时,EL0.5 还可以直接与单位 BMF 阈值相关联。因此,EL0.5 作为生物蓄积指标克服了 BMF 和 TMF 的缺点,同时保留了后两者指标的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验