Suppr超能文献

根据髋膝关节疾病严重程度比较健康相关生活质量、工作状态以及卫生保健的使用和费用:一项澳大利亚全国性研究。

Comparison of health-related quality of life, work status, and health care utilization and costs according to hip and knee joint disease severity: a national Australian study.

机构信息

The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2013 Jul;93(7):889-99. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120423. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No population-based studies have investigated how the impact of hip and knee joint disease may vary with increasing severity.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work status, and health service utilization and costs according to severity of hip and knee joint disease.

DESIGN

A national cross-sectional survey was conducted.

METHODS

Five thousand individuals were randomly selected from the Australian electoral roll and invited to complete a questionnaire to screen for doctor-diagnosed hip arthritis, hip osteoarthritis (OA), knee arthritis, and knee OA. Severity was classified by means of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (range=0-100): <7=asymptomatic, 7-38=mild-moderate, and ≥39=severe. Health-related quality of life was evaluated by means of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument (range=-0.04 to 1.00; scored worst-best). Self-reported data on work status and health service utilization were collected, with health care costs estimated with the use of government data.

RESULTS

Data were available for 1,157 participants, with 237 (20%) reporting hip or knee joint disease. Of these, 16% (n=37) were classified as asymptomatic, 51% (n=120) as mild-moderate, and 27% (n=64) as severe. The severe group reported very low HRQoL (adjusted mean AQoL=0.43, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=0.38-0.47) compared with the mild-moderate group (adjusted mean AQoL=0.72, 95% CI=0.69-0.75) and the asymptomatic group (adjusted mean AQoL=0.80, 95% CI=0.74-0.86). Compared with the asymptomatic group, the severe group was >3 times less likely to undertake paid work (adjusted odds ratio=0.28, 95% CI=0.09-0.88) and >4 times less likely to undertake unpaid work (adjusted odds ratio=0.24, 95% CI=0.10-0.62). Although physical therapy services were used infrequently, primary and specialist care utilization and costs were highest for the severe group.

LIMITATIONS

Other costs (including physical therapy consultations) were unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear pattern of worsening HRQoL, reduced work participation, and higher medical care utilization was seen with increasing severity of joint disease.

摘要

背景

尚无基于人群的研究调查髋膝关节疾病的影响随严重程度增加而变化的情况。

目的

本研究旨在评估髋膝关节疾病严重程度与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、工作状况、卫生服务利用和成本之间的关系。

设计

全国性横断面调查。

方法

从澳大利亚选举名单中随机抽取 5000 人,邀请他们完成一份问卷以筛查医生诊断的髋关节炎、髋骨关节炎(OA)、膝关节炎和膝骨关节炎。通过 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(范围=0-100)对严重程度进行分类:<7=无症状,7-38=轻度-中度,≥39=重度。通过评估生活质量(AQoL)工具评估 HRQoL(范围=-0.04 至 1.00;得分最差-最好)。收集自我报告的工作状况和卫生服务利用数据,并使用政府数据估计医疗保健成本。

结果

共纳入 1157 名参与者,其中 237 名(20%)报告有髋或膝关节疾病。其中,16%(n=37)为无症状,51%(n=120)为轻度-中度,27%(n=64)为重度。重度组报告的 HRQoL 非常低(调整后 AQoL 平均值=0.43,95%置信区间[95%CI]=0.38-0.47),与轻度-中度组(调整后 AQoL 平均值=0.72,95%CI=0.69-0.75)和无症状组(调整后 AQoL 平均值=0.80,95%CI=0.74-0.86)相比。与无症状组相比,重度组从事有偿工作的可能性低 3 倍以上(调整后的优势比=0.28,95%CI=0.09-0.88),从事无偿工作的可能性低 4 倍以上(调整后的优势比=0.24,95%CI=0.10-0.62)。尽管物理治疗服务的利用率较低,但重度组的初级保健和专科保健的利用率和成本最高。

局限性

其他成本(包括物理治疗咨询)不可用。

结论

随着关节疾病的严重程度增加,HRQoL 明显恶化、工作参与减少以及医疗保健利用率增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验