• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后疼痛评估:患者与医生之间差异的影响因素。

Assessment of postoperative pain: Contributing factors to the differences between patients and doctors.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, C450, University of California, San Francisco, 521 Parnassus Avenue, 94143-0648, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Anesth. 1994 Sep;8(3):277-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02514650.

DOI:10.1007/BF02514650
PMID:23568112
Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 50 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analog scale 5 h and 20 h after major abdominal surgery, and to examine the relationships between the differences in rating of patients and doctors and the factors inherent in the patients which include preoperative expectation of pain, level of anxiety, and the surgical history of the patient. The ratings given by the patients were significantly higher than those given by the doctors at both time periods. However, the correlation between the ratings given by the two was low:r=0.31 andr s=0.27 at 5 h after the operations, andr=0.58 andr s=0.49 at 20 h. The results of analysis using Hayashi's quantification theory Type II indicated a moderate association between the rating difference and the patient's age, surgical history, preoperative state of anxiety, and expectation of pain. It is concluded that postoperative pain management, whether in clinical practice or in research, necessitates more consideration of the several above-mentioned individual factors and a preoperative interview in which the patient's level of anxiety and the amount of information the patient has concerning the surgery and post-operative pain is clearly assessed.

摘要

本研究旨在比较 50 名患者和他们的医生在主要腹部手术后 5 小时和 20 小时根据视觉模拟量表评估疼痛强度,并探讨患者和医生评分之间的差异与患者内在因素之间的关系,这些因素包括术前对疼痛的预期、焦虑程度和患者的手术史。患者的评分在两个时间段均明显高于医生的评分。然而,两者之间的相关性较低:术后 5 小时 r=0.31 和 rs=0.27,术后 20 小时 r=0.58 和 rs=0.49。使用 Hayashi 的量化理论 II 型进行的分析结果表明,评分差异与患者的年龄、手术史、术前焦虑状态和疼痛预期之间存在中度关联。结论是,无论是在临床实践还是在研究中,术后疼痛管理都需要更多地考虑上述几个个体因素,并在术前访谈中,明确评估患者的焦虑程度以及患者对手术和术后疼痛的信息量。

相似文献

1
Assessment of postoperative pain: Contributing factors to the differences between patients and doctors.术后疼痛评估:患者与医生之间差异的影响因素。
J Anesth. 1994 Sep;8(3):277-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02514650.
2
Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.患者和医生评估术后疼痛时的差异。
J Anesth. 1993 Jul;7(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s0054030070287.
3
Higher physical activity and lower pain levels before surgery predict non-improvement of knee pain 1 year after TKA.术前较高的身体活动水平和较低的疼痛水平预示着 TKA 后 1 年膝关节疼痛不会改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1698-1708. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4713-5. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?脊柱手术后首次术后评估时的总体结果评分:外科医生和患者的意见一致频率如何?
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):386-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1028-3. Epub 2009 May 22.
5
The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.人工关节置换候选帮助引擎工具选择髋关节和膝关节置换手术的候选者:开发和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(32):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta23320.
6
7
Patients' pre-operative general and specific outcome expectations predict postoperative pain and function after total knee and total hip arthroplasties.患者术前的总体和特定结果期望可预测全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术后的疼痛及功能情况。
Scand J Pain. 2018 Jul 26;18(3):457-466. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0022.
8
Factors related to patients' anxiety before and after oral surgery.口腔手术前后与患者焦虑相关的因素。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):870-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.662.
9
Determination of clinically meaningful levels of pain reduction in patients experiencing acute postoperative pain.确定急性术后疼痛患者临床上有意义的疼痛减轻水平。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2006 Dec;7(4):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2006.09.001.
10
Can Patients Forecast Their Postoperative Disability and Pain?患者能否预测术后残疾和疼痛?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Mar;477(3):635-643. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000627.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.患者和医生评估术后疼痛时的差异。
J Anesth. 1993 Jul;7(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s0054030070287.
2
REDUCTION OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN BY ENCOURAGEMENT AND INSTRUCTION OF PATIENTS. A STUDY OF DOCTOR-PATIENT RAPPORT.通过鼓励和指导患者减轻术后疼痛。医患关系的一项研究。
N Engl J Med. 1964 Apr 16;270:825-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196404162701606.
3
Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement.疼痛测量:患者偏好不会干扰疼痛测量。
Pain. 1981 Apr;10(2):241-248. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8.
4
Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain.术后疼痛的术前预测因素。
Pain. 1983 Mar;15(3):283-93. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90063-5.
5
Postthoracotomy pain and pulmonary function following epidural and systemic morphine.开胸术后硬膜外和全身应用吗啡后的疼痛及肺功能
Anesthesiology. 1984 Nov;61(5):569-75. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198411000-00017.
6
An approach to the measurement of the pain and anxiety responses of surgical patients.一种测量外科手术患者疼痛和焦虑反应的方法。
Psychosom Med. 1968 Nov-Dec;30(6):826-36. doi: 10.1097/00006842-196811000-00003.
7
Pain tolerance: differences according to age, sex and race.疼痛耐受性:根据年龄、性别和种族的差异
Psychosom Med. 1972 Nov-Dec;34(6):548-56. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197211000-00007.
8
Continuous-plus-on-demand epidural infusion of morphine for postoperative pain relief by means of a small, externally worn infusion device.
Anesthesiology. 1985 Mar;62(3):263-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198503000-00009.
9
Adverse cognitive effects of general anaesthesia in young and elderly patients.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1986 Jul;1(3):253-9. doi: 10.1097/00004850-198607000-00008.
10
Assessment of pain: a comparison between patients and doctors.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989 Apr;33(3):255-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb02901.x.