Suppr超能文献

疼痛测量:患者偏好不会干扰疼痛测量。

Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement.

作者信息

Kremer Edwin, Atkinson Hampton J, Ignelzi R J

机构信息

University of California at San Diego, Medical School, La Jolla, Calif. 92093 U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain. 1981 Apr;10(2):241-248. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8.

Abstract

Chronic pain patients reported pain intensity on each of 3 pain intensity scales, the visual analog, numerical and adjectival scales, and then ranked the scales in order of perceived best communication of pain intensity. All patients were able to complete an adjectival scale but 11% were unable to complete a visual analog scale and 2% failed at a numeric scale. The intensity of the pain ratings on the 3 scales were significantly correlated and there were no reliable differences in reported intensity as a function of preference. Pain intensity was reliably higher on each scale for depressed-anxious patients as compared to non-depressed/non-anxious patients. Patients completing all 3 scales indicated a significant preference for the adjectival scale but the basis for this preference did not appear related to sex, etiology of pain, affective variables nor selected psychological variables. These data indicate that pain scale preference does not influence pain intensity report. Nevertheless, there are some clinical situations in which a numeric scale is likely to yield a better measure of pain intensity.

摘要

慢性疼痛患者在三种疼痛强度量表(视觉模拟量表、数字量表和形容词量表)上分别报告疼痛强度,然后按照他们认为最能传达疼痛强度的顺序对这些量表进行排序。所有患者都能够完成形容词量表,但11%的患者无法完成视觉模拟量表,2%的患者在数字量表上未能完成。三种量表上的疼痛评分强度显著相关,并且报告的强度在偏好方面没有可靠差异。与非抑郁/非焦虑患者相比,抑郁焦虑患者在每种量表上的疼痛强度确实更高。完成所有三种量表的患者表示对形容词量表有明显偏好,但这种偏好的依据似乎与性别、疼痛病因、情感变量或所选心理变量无关。这些数据表明,疼痛量表偏好不会影响疼痛强度报告。然而,在某些临床情况下,数字量表可能会更好地测量疼痛强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验